To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar 5-year clinical outcomes between patient specific and conventional instrumentation in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2019

Similar 5-year clinical outcomes between patient specific and conventional instrumentation in TKA

Vol: 8| Issue: 7| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No difference in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1463-1468.

Contributing Authors:
B Boonen W van der Weegen NP Kort R Van Drumpt MGM Schotanus H Hoekstra R Borghans R Vos L van Rhijn

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

180 patients with knee osteoarthritis and scheduled for a primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to receive implant alignment with either with patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or conventional instrumentation (CI). Outcomes of interest included revision rate, the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Oste...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue