Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
RCT
ACE Report #11702
Ace Report Cover Spine

Chuna manual therapy vs. usual care vs. combination of the two, for treatment of non-acute LBP


Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparative effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for non-acute low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Trials. 2019 Apr 15;20(1):216.

Contributing Authors: JH Lee BC Shin KW Kim JH Cho IH Ha MR Kim KT Lim EH Hwang JY Jung K Nam AM Lee N Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients with non-acute lower back pain were randomized to receive Chuna manual therapy (CMT), usual care, or CMT plus usual care for the relief of lower back pain, and improvement of function and quality of life. The primary outcome of interest was lower back pain levels on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Noted secondary outcome measures included leg pain on an NRS and the Oswestry Disability ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.