To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Improved acute quadriceps muscle activation, similar long term outcomes with ACB vs. FNB in ACLR

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Improved acute quadriceps muscle activation, similar long term outcomes with ACB vs. FNB in ACLR

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:28| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Adductor Canal Nerve Versus Femoral Nerve Blockade for Pain Control and Quadriceps Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Arthroscopy. 2019 Mar;35(3):921-929.

Contributing Authors:
J Wu W Lowe C Harner L Bailey J Griffin M Elliott T Papavasiliou

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

86 patients scheduled for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were randomized to receive an adductor canal block (ACB) or a femoral nerve block (FNB). Outcomes of interest included pain scores, morphine consumption, quadriceps muscle activation deficit, straight leg raise test, ambulation status, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, extension range of motion deficit, flex...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue