To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Higher 10-yr success rate and lower rate of ASD requiring secondary surgery with CDA versus ACDF

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Higher 10-yr success rate and lower rate of ASD requiring secondary surgery with CDA versus ACDF

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Symptomatic Adjacent Level Disease Requiring Surgery: Analysis of 10-Year Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Fusion

Neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 1;84(2):347-354. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy118

Contributing Authors:
KD Riew GM Ghobrial WF Lavelle JE Florman AD Levi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

463 patients with degenerative cervical disc disease were randomized to operative management with either cervical disc arthroplasty (BRYAN artificial disc; Medtronic) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft. Patients were followed for 10 years postoperatively. Only 235 patients - 130 and 105 patients in the groups, respectively - were available after 10 years. Available da...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue