To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Lower pain at 24-48hr with cACB versus ssACB plus PCA fentanyl in total knee arthroplasty

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Lower pain at 24-48hr with cACB versus ssACB plus PCA fentanyl in total knee arthroplasty

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The analgesic efficacy of the continuous adductor canal block compared to continuous intravenous fentanyl infusion with a single-shot adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Korean J Pain. 2019 Jan;32(1):30-38. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.1.30

Contributing Authors:
H Kang HY Shin HJ Lee MK Kim HY Moon CG Ryu

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

44 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to a postoperative analgesia regimen including either a continuous adductor canal block or a single-shot adductor canal block followed by patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl. Primary purpose of this study was to determine if there were any significant differences between groups in pain scores, on a numeric rating scale, over ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue