To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No significant difference in treatment response between traditional vs. sham acupuncture for knee OA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2019

No significant difference in treatment response between traditional vs. sham acupuncture for knee OA

Vol: 8| Issue: 1| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effectiveness and feasibility of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Clin Rehabil. 2018 Dec;32(12):1666-1675. doi: 10.1177/0269215518790632

Contributing Authors:
Y Du S Zhang YT Li LL Lin JF Tu JW Yang N Sun TQ Wang GX Shi JJ Zhao DC Xiong HK Hou CZ Liu

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

42 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III knee osteoarthritis were randomized to an 8 week protocol of either traditional Chinese acupuncture or sham acupuncture. Patients attended 20-minute treatment sessions, three times per week for the 8 weeks. Patients were primarily assessed for rate of treatment response, based on a reduction of at least 36 points in the sum of the Western Ontario and...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue