To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Propofol-fentanyl vs. propofol-ketamine in trauma patients for procedural sedation and analgesia

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2018

Propofol-fentanyl vs. propofol-ketamine in trauma patients for procedural sedation and analgesia

Vol: 7| Issue: 12| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1766-1770.

Contributing Authors:
SM Hosseininejad H Amini Ahidashti F Bozorgi S Shafiee A Firouzian A Barzegarnejad AZ Kiasari BF Kerigh M Shafizad A Geraeeli

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

136 trauma patients from the emergency room were randomized to receive either propofol-fentanyl or propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA). Follow up was conducted at 5, 15, 30, and 120 minutes post PSA administration. The primary outcomes of the study were depth of sedation and pain score (VAS); secondary outcomes included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, O2 sa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue