To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Post-operative rotator cuff repair immobilization: 3 weeks in a sling vs. 6 weeks in a brace

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Post-operative rotator cuff repair immobilization: 3 weeks in a sling vs. 6 weeks in a brace

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No Functional Difference Between Three and Six Weeks of Immobilization after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Arthroscopy. 2018 Oct;34(10):2765-2774

Contributing Authors:
JE Madsen A Hugo Pripp KK Jenssen K Lundgreen R Kvakestad S Dimmen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

120 patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears were randomized to receive either 3 weeks of post-surgery immobilization in a sling, or 6 weeks of immobilization in a brace (with an abduction pillow placing the arm in a neutral position). Follow-up was performed at the 6 week time-point, as well as at 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Outcomes reported included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue