To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Gait and functional performance favoured with DA vs DL THA, but no difference in subjective function

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
February 2019

Gait and functional performance favoured with DA vs DL THA, but no difference in subjective function

Vol: 8| Issue: 2| Number:124| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomised trial comparing spatio-temporal gait parameters after total hip arthroplasty between the direct anterior and direct lateral surgical approaches

Hip Int. 2018 Sep;28(5):478-484. doi: 10.1177/1120700018760262

Contributing Authors:
D Bryant JL Howard B Lanting EM Vasarhelyi BO Zomar S Hunter

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

78 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to the surgery performed through either the direct anterior approach or the direct lateral approach. Patients were assessed over the first 12 weeks for parameters from gait analysis, functional performance on the Timed Up and Go test, and patient-reported functional and pain outcomes. Results demonstrated favourable results with resp...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue