To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cement augmentation of PFNA for trochanteric fracture has no significant effect on early function

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

Cement augmentation of PFNA for trochanteric fracture has no significant effect on early function

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:21| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) - A multicentre randomized controlled trial

Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1436-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.022

Contributing Authors:
A Sermon Y Weil F Gebhard ES Hem C Kammerlander T Klopfer M Dietrich O Bach R Babst M Blauth

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

253 patients scheduled for intramedullary nailing of a trochanteric fracture with the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation helical blade implant (PFNA; DePuy) were randomized to either receive or not receive additional cement augmentation of the device. The primary outcome was the functional performance on the Timed Up and Go test, while secondary outcomes included mobility and activities of daily l...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue