To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No effect on dysphagia of local DepoMedrol versus saline in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2018

No effect on dysphagia of local DepoMedrol versus saline in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Vol: 7| Issue: 8| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Impact of local steroid application on dysphagia following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized single-blind trial

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):10-17

Contributing Authors:
K Singh J Ahn AS Narain FY Hijji B Haws BC Mayo DH Massel DD Bohl B Khechen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

121 patients scheduled for single- or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were randomized to intraoperative local application or either methylprednisolone 40mg (DepoMedrol) or saline. The primary purpose of this study was to compared patient-reported swallowing function between groups after 6 and 12 weeks. Additional, preveterbral soft-tissue swelling was assessed on sagittal radiog...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue