LOGIN
No advantage of patient-specific instrumentation over conventional instruments in UKA
February 2019
No advantage of patient-specific instrumentation over conventional instruments in UKA
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1
The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1662-1670Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
55 patients scheduled for an Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were randomized to either patient-specific instrumentation use or conventional instrumentation use for surgery. Patients were assessed for radiographic outcome at 6 weeks postoperatively, while clinical outcome on the Oxford Knee Score was assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Results demonstrated no significant differences be...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.