To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

COA-ACO2018: Dynamic versus static fixation methods for syndesmosis injuries

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2018

COA-ACO2018: Dynamic versus static fixation methods for syndesmosis injuries

Vol: 7| Issue: 6| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Dynamic vs. Static Fixation of Acute Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-Analysis

Contributing Authors:
SS Kooner

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

Eight randomized controlled trials or cohort studies were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis which compared functional outcome, hardware removal rate, and malreduction rate between dynamic fixation and static fixation of syndesmosis injuries. Functional outcomes were pooled at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results demonstrated significant differences in favour of dynamic fixation c...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue