To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Better early ambulation and pain scores with continuous ACB versus epidural analgesia in primary TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2019

Better early ambulation and pain scores with continuous ACB versus epidural analgesia in primary TKA

Vol: 8| Issue: 1| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Continuous Adductor Canal Blocks Provide Superior Ambulation and Pain Control Compared to Epidural Analgesia for Primary Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1040-1044

Contributing Authors:
CJ Della Valle M Moric A Buvanendran E Kayupov TL Gerlinger K Okroj TJ Luchetti G Zisman AC Young

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

145 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to a perioperative regimen consisting of either spinal anaesthesia combined with continuous adductor canal block, general anaesthesia combined with continuous adductor canal block, or combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Patients were primarily assessed for walking distance during postoperative physical therapy. Both groups which ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue