To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Migration of cemented versus uncemented, hydroxyapatite fixation in total knee arthroplasty

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2018

Migration of cemented versus uncemented, hydroxyapatite fixation in total knee arthroplasty

Vol: 7| Issue: 6| Number:4| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Fixation and clinical outcome of uncemented peri-apatite-coated versus cemented total knee arthroplasty : five-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis (RSA)

Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1467-1476

Contributing Authors:
S Toksvig-Larsen ER Valstar KT van Hamersveld PJ Marang-van de Mheen R Tsonaka

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either uncemented fixation with hydroxyapatite-coated components, or to cement fixation. Patients were assessed for component migration via maximum total point motion using radiostereometric analysis. Results demonstrated significantly greater total MTPM after 5 years in the uncemented group compared to the cemented group, but no...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.