TKA: Drain-clamping with tranexamic acid decreased drained blood volume/ transfusions .
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(7):4 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jul 20;13:124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-124240 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were randomized to examine the efficacy of temporary clamping of the drain with or without tranexamic acid for haemostasis. Patients were divided into four groups; a control group fitted with a drain (no clamping) and a placebo injection, a group undergoing drain clamping and a placebo injection, a group fitted with a drain (no clamping) and an injection of tranexamic acid, or a group receiving both clamping of the drain and tranexamic acid. Results after the first 48 hours demonstrated that patients who received both treatments had the lowest mean postoperative volumes of drained blood and amount of blood transfusions required.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
Oui = 1
Incertain = 0,5
Non pertinent = 0
Non = 0
L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.
3/4
Randomization
4/4
Outcome Measurements
2/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
3/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.
Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?
While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritic knee, the procedure is associated with significant blood loss which is problematic due to the requirement of postoperative blood transfusion. Drain clamping and tranexamic acid administration have been individually proposed as a method to reduce postoperative TKA blood loss in previous studies; however, no study has compared the efficacy of drain clamping combined with tranexamic acid administration in the control of bleeding after TKA.
Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?
Would temporary clamping of the drain combined with tranexamic acid lead to lower amount of post-TKA blood loss and transfusions than with either of these processes alone?
- Group A (1182 +/- 411 ml) had significantly higher (p < 0.001) volume of drained blood than groups B (724 +/- 246 ml), C (821 +/-337 ml), and D (526 +/- 222 ml) but there were no significant differences in those between group B and C (p = 0.37).
- The lowest drained-blood volume was found in group D (p < 0.001).
- Group B (2.1 +/- 0.6 g/dl), C (2.8 +/- 0.8 g/dl), D (1.8 +/- 0.7 g/dl) had significantly lower (p < 0.05) levels of decreasing Hb than those in group A (3.3 +/- 0.9).
- While group B and D could maintain the Hb level better than group C (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between group B and D (p = 0.07).
- The amount of PRC transfusion units required in group B and D were significantly lower than group A and C (p < 0.001); there was no significant difference between group A and C (p = 0.05).
- Those who received the least blood transfusion (0.4 +/- 0.5 unit) were in group D (significantly lower than group B, p < 0.04).
- No wound infections or clinical venous thromboembolisms were detected in all groups.
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?
This study demonstrated the effectiveness of combining drain-clamping technique with tranexamic acid administration to reduce postoperative blood loss after TKA. Compared to the control group, the use of this combination could reduce the volume of drained blood significantly more than using either tranexamic acid or drain clamping alone. Furthermore, the combined method required the lowest amount of transfusion unit.
Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?
The use of combining the two treatments displayed better hemostatic effect than using tranexamic acid or drain clamping alone. However, future studies with larger sample sizes are required to further study the effects of these treatments, especially as this study focused only on the efficacy in controlling blood loss.
AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ
Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
