ACE Report Cover
PRP does not improve healing or functional outcome in Achilles tendon rupture
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
FOOT & ANKLE
PRP does not improve healing or functional outcome in Achilles tendon rupture .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.
High Impact
Questo studio è stato identificato come potenzialmente ad alto impatto. La metrica High Impact di OE, guidata dall'AI, stima l'influenza che un articolo potrebbe avere integrando i segnali della rivista in cui è stato pubblicato e il contenuto scientifico dell'articolo stesso. Sviluppato utilizzando un'elaborazione del linguaggio naturale all'avanguardia, il modello High Impact di OE prevede in modo più accurato la futura performance citazionale di uno studio rispetto al solo fattore di impatto della rivista. Ciò consente di riconoscere prima le ricerche clinicamente significative e aiuta i lettori a concentrarsi sugli articoli che hanno maggiori probabilità di influenzare la pratica futura.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(5):29 Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/0363546510383515. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
Autori che hanno contribuito

T Schepull J Kvist H Norrman M Trinks G Berlin P Aspenberg

Exclusive Author Interview

Dr. Per Aspenberg discusses PRP as an adjunctive treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

30 patients presenting with an acute Achilles tendon rupture were included in this randomized trial to investigate the effects of platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) in tendon healing. Patients were randomized to receive 10 ml of autologous PRP injected through a cannula into the rupture site following repair or repair with no additional treatment. Mechanical (E-modulus) and functional (heel raising index) outcomes were measured over a one year period. There were no differences in mechanical outcomes between the groups over the 1 year period, and both groups exhibited significant functional deficits compared to the uninjured limb.


Dettagli sul finanziamento della pubblicazione +
Finanziamento:
Non-Industry funded
Sponsor:
Swedish Medical Research Council, the Swedish Center for Sports Medicine Research, and the King Gustav V and Queen Victoria Freemason Fund
Conflitti:
Other

Rischio di pregiudizio

8/10

Criteri di segnalazione

18/20

Indice di fragilità

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sì = 1

Incerto = 0,5

Non rilevante = 0

No = 0

La valutazione dei criteri di segnalazione valuta la trasparenza con cui gli autori riportano le caratteristiche metodologiche e sperimentali dello studio all'interno della pubblicazione. La valutazione è suddivisa in cinque categorie che vengono presentate di seguito.

3/4

Randomization

4/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

L'Indice di Fragilità è uno strumento che aiuta l'interpretazione dei risultati significativi, fornendo una misura della forza di un risultato. L'Indice di Fragilità rappresenta il numero di eventi consecutivi che devono essere aggiunti a un risultato dicotomico per rendere il risultato non più significativo. Un numero piccolo rappresenta un risultato più debole, mentre un numero grande rappresenta un risultato più forte.

Perché questo studio era necessario ora?

Rehabilitation following Achilles tendon rupture is a long and arduous process which is limited by the time required for the tendon the fully heal. A number of treatments have been developed in an attempt to expedite this healing and improve both functional and clinical outcomes. Platelet-Rich Plasma may be a promising possible treatment, having demonstrated an ability to increase fibrous tissue growth, tissue vascularity and improve tendon strength in animal models and retrospective clinical trials.

Qual era la domanda di ricerca principale?

Did the use of Platelet-Rich-Plasma improve tendon healing in patients with an acute rupture of the Achilles tendon compared to controls assessed at different time points over a 52 week period?

Caratteristiche dello studio +
Population:
30 patients between the ages of 18-60 presenting with an acute rupture of the Achilles tendon (no older than 3 days)
Intervention:
PRP: Patients underwent surgical repair using a conventional open technique with a dorsomedial approach. A cannula was inserted into the rupture site and a syringe with 10 ml of autologous PRP (with addition of 1 ml calcium chloride 0.25 mmol/ml) (PRP was obtained by double centrifugation according to accredited procedures.) (n=16, 12 at final follow-up)
Comparison:
Control: Patients underwent surgical repair using a conventional open technique with a dorsomedial approach. A cannula was inserted into the rupture site, however, no injection was given and PRP solution was discarded. (n=14)
Outcomes:
Primary outcome measures were E-modulus at week 7 and heel raise index at week 52.RSA and CT measures were taken at 7,19 and 52 weeks to assist in the calculation of E-modulus and heel raise index. Functional assessment was completed at 6 months (20 patients) and 1 year. Patients also completed the Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score.
Methods:
RCT: Single Blind
Time:
Follow-up time periods included 7, 19, 26, and 52 weeks.
Quali erano i risultati importanti?
  • There were no significant different in mechanical properties (E-modulus or transverse area) at any time point (7, 19 or 52 weeks) between the PRP or control groups (p>0.05).
  • At 6 months there were significant deficits in function in the injured limb compared to the uninjured limb. These deficits were greatest in the more demanding tasks such as heal raising compare to range of motion. At 12 months there were still significant deficits in all functional outcomes except for peak force during toe-off in gait and vertical jumping.
  • Functional outcome at 12 months measured using the heel raise index was not significantly different between the PRP and control group.
  • Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score was lower at 12 months for the PRP group (78; 75-85) compared to the controls (89; 83-92) (p=0.014)
  • One patient in the PRP group had a re-rupture, no patients in the control group had re-ruptures.
Che cosa devo ricordare di più?

There were no benefits in the use of Platelet-Rich-Plasma following operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Patients demonstrated similar mechanical outcomes (E-modulus and transverse area) at all time points up to one year. Additionally, both groups demonstrated a significant deficit in functional ability measured using heel raise index compared to the uninjured limb at 6 and 12 months, while failing to exhibit any differences between groups. Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score was the only functional measure that demonstrated a difference between groups at 12 months; this measure favoured the control group.

Come influenzerà l'assistenza ai miei pazienti?

The results from this study do not indicate any substantial benefit of the use of PRP in Achilles tendon healing following operative repair of an acute tendon rupture. The use of PRP may possibly have a negative effect on functional outcomes at 1 year. A major strength of this study was the use of objective measures of healing. Therefore, future research studies using larger sample sizes (along with the same objective assessments of healing) are required to definitively determine the effect of PRP in healing acute Achillies tendon ruptures.

DISCLAIMER

Il contenuto di questa pagina è solo a scopo informativo e non intende sostituire la consulenza, la diagnosi o il trattamento medico professionale. Se ha bisogno di cure mediche, si rivolga sempre al suo medico o al pronto soccorso più vicino. Le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista espressi dalle persone sui contenuti presenti in questa pagina non riflettono le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista di OrthoEvidence.

0 di 4 articoli mensili GRATUITI sbloccati
Ha raggiunto il suo limite di 4 visualizzazioni di articoli gratuiti questo mese

Accesso a OrthoEvidence a soli 1,99 dollari a settimana.

Rimanga in contatto con le ultime prove. Può disdire in qualsiasi momento.
  • Valutazioni critiche dei più recenti studi randomizzati controllati ad alto impatto e delle revisioni sistematiche in ortopedia.
  • Accesso ai contenuti del podcast OrthoEvidence, tra cui collaborazioni con il Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviste con chirurghi di fama internazionale e tavole rotonde su notizie e argomenti ortopedici.
  • Abbonamento a The Pulse, una newsletter bisettimanale basata sulle evidenze scientifiche, progettata per aiutarla a prendere decisioni cliniche migliori.
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bentornato!
Ha dimenticato la password?
Inizi la sua prova gratuita oggi stesso!

Il suo account sarà affiliato a
e includerà l'accesso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
Ha dimenticato la password?

O
Controlli la sua e-mail

Se esiste un account con l'indirizzo e-mail fornito, le verrà inviata un'e-mail di reimpostazione della password. Se non vede l'e-mail, controlli la cartella spam o posta indesiderata.

Per ulteriore assistenza, contatti il nostro team di supporto.

Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Tradurre il Rapporto ACE

OrthoEvidence utilizza un servizio di traduzione di terze parti per rendere i contenuti accessibili in più lingue. Si prega di notare che, sebbene venga fatto ogni sforzo per garantire l'accuratezza, le traduzioni potrebbero non essere sempre perfette.

Come citare questo documento ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. PRP does not improve healing or functional outcome in Achilles tendon rupture. OE Journal. 2013;1(5):29. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/prp-does-not-improve-healing-or-functional-outcome-in-achilles-tendon-rupture

Copiare la citazione
Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Funzionalità per i membri Premium

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence Premium.

Condividi questo articolo ACE Report