ACE Report Cover
Similar treatment time and pain in tension-band plating vs stapling for hemiepiphysiodesis
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS
Similar treatment time and pain in tension-band plating vs stapling for hemiepiphysiodesis .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(8):18 Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):202-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.782526. Epub 2013 Mar 14

The present trial evaluated 20 children with idiopathic genu valgum (IGV) who were randomized for hemiepiphysiodesis with either a tension band construct or staples to correct angular deformities. To compare the efficiency of both treatment methods, the time for correction of deformity, changes in angles as measured on radiographs, pain by visual analog scale (VAS) and analgesic consumption were recorded. The post-operative results indicated no differences between using staples and tension band plating for all outcomes.


Dettagli sul finanziamento della pubblicazione +
Finanziamento:
Non-Industry funded
Sponsor:
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and the Central Denmark Region
Conflitti:
None disclosed

Rischio di pregiudizio

6/10

Criteri di segnalazione

18/20

Indice di fragilità

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sì = 1

Incerto = 0,5

Non rilevante = 0

No = 0

La valutazione dei criteri di segnalazione valuta la trasparenza con cui gli autori riportano le caratteristiche metodologiche e sperimentali dello studio all'interno della pubblicazione. La valutazione è suddivisa in cinque categorie che vengono presentate di seguito.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

3/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

L'Indice di Fragilità è uno strumento che aiuta l'interpretazione dei risultati significativi, fornendo una misura della forza di un risultato. L'Indice di Fragilità rappresenta il numero di eventi consecutivi che devono essere aggiunti a un risultato dicotomico per rendere il risultato non più significativo. Un numero piccolo rappresenta un risultato più debole, mentre un numero grande rappresenta un risultato più forte.

Perché questo studio era necessario ora?

Hemiepiphysiodesis is used to correct excessive angular deformities in the extremities of children. Implants stop unilateral growth until the deformity is corrected and are then removed to resume growth. Staples have been used for this procedure, but are associated with complications such as staple migration, breakage, and premature growth plate closure. More recently, tension-band plating has been introduced for faster correction and prevention of growth plate compression. However, no known randomized trial has demonstrated superiority of tension-band plating technique over stapling.

Qual era la domanda di ricerca principale?

How do the clinical and radiographic effects of stapling compare to tension-band plating in children with IGV of the distal femur?

Caratteristiche dello studio +
Population:
26 children with idiopathic genu valgum, aged 8-15 years, with limited daily activities, at least 7 cm of intermalleolar distance, and at least 6 months of estimated remaining growth.
Intervention:
Tension-band group: 1 plate with 2 cannulated screws was placed spanning the growth plate (8-plate system; 16-mm titanium plate and 32-mm cannulated titanium screws; Orthofix, McKinney, TX) (n = 10). The children were slightly younger (mean age 10.1 (range 8-14) years). M/F= 8/2
Comparison:
Staple Group: 3 staples were placed across the physis of the femoral growth plate (chromium-cobalt steel, Large; Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN) (n = 10). The mean age was 11.1 (range 6-13) years at time of surgery. M/F = 3/7
Outcomes:
Outcomes: Time to correction of the deformity, changes in angles on long standing radiographs, visual analog scale (VAS) pain for the first 72 hours, analgesic use
Methods:
RCT; Single Center
Time:
Radiographs 14 days after surgery and regular visits thereafter with minimum 3 months between each
Quali erano i risultati importanti?
  • The tension band group and staples group had similar time taken to correct idiopathic genu valgum deformity (mean 340 days (286–394) vs. mean 349 days (263–435), respectively) (p=0.8). Cohen’s delta showed an estimated effect size of 0.075.
  • No implant failures, infection or growth arrests occurred, while all 20 children achieved correction of genu valgum deformity.
  • Although groups differed in gender (M/F in staples group = 3/7 vs tension band = 8/2) and age (tension band group mean age = 10.1 ( 8–14 years) vs. staples group mean age = 11.1 (6–13) years), there were no differences in treatment time, preoperative intermalleolar distance, and measured radiographic values (LDFA, MPTA, and MAD) treatment (p>0.05).
  • VAS pain was recorded for 18/20 children and was similar in both groups (p>0.05) 72 hours postoperatively.
  • 1 child in tension-band group had a rebound of intermalliolar distance of 8 cm and was scheduled for surgery
Che cosa devo ricordare di più?

Hemiepiphysiodesis with both tension band and staples have similar treatment time and angle correction of idiopathic genu valgum.

Come influenzerà l'assistenza ai miei pazienti?

The trial was not able to show superiority of either hemiepiphysiodesis methods. Further studies with larger populations need to be conducted as this study may be underpowered.

DISCLAIMER

Il contenuto di questa pagina è solo a scopo informativo e non intende sostituire la consulenza, la diagnosi o il trattamento medico professionale. Se ha bisogno di cure mediche, si rivolga sempre al suo medico o al pronto soccorso più vicino. Le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista espressi dalle persone sui contenuti presenti in questa pagina non riflettono le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista di OrthoEvidence.

0 di 4 articoli mensili GRATUITI sbloccati
Ha raggiunto il suo limite di 4 visualizzazioni di articoli gratuiti questo mese

Accesso a OrthoEvidence a soli 1,99 dollari a settimana.

Rimanga in contatto con le ultime prove. Può disdire in qualsiasi momento.
  • Valutazioni critiche dei più recenti studi randomizzati controllati ad alto impatto e delle revisioni sistematiche in ortopedia.
  • Accesso ai contenuti del podcast OrthoEvidence, tra cui collaborazioni con il Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviste con chirurghi di fama internazionale e tavole rotonde su notizie e argomenti ortopedici.
  • Abbonamento a The Pulse, una newsletter bisettimanale basata sulle evidenze scientifiche, progettata per aiutarla a prendere decisioni cliniche migliori.
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bentornato!
Ha dimenticato la password?
Inizi la sua prova gratuita oggi stesso!

Il suo account sarà affiliato a
e includerà l'accesso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
Ha dimenticato la password?

O
Controlli la sua e-mail

Se esiste un account con l'indirizzo e-mail fornito, le verrà inviata un'e-mail di reimpostazione della password. Se non vede l'e-mail, controlli la cartella spam o posta indesiderata.

Per ulteriore assistenza, contatti il nostro team di supporto.

Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Tradurre il Rapporto ACE

OrthoEvidence utilizza un servizio di traduzione di terze parti per rendere i contenuti accessibili in più lingue. Si prega di notare che, sebbene venga fatto ogni sforzo per garantire l'accuratezza, le traduzioni potrebbero non essere sempre perfette.

Come citare questo documento ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Similar treatment time and pain in tension-band plating vs stapling for hemiepiphysiodesis. OE Journal. 2013;1(8):18. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/similar-treatment-time-and-pain-in-tension-band-plating-vs-stapling-for-hemiepiphysiodesis

Copiare la citazione
Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Funzionalità per i membri Premium

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence Premium.

Condividi questo articolo ACE Report