ACE Report Cover
Similar treatment time and pain in tension-band plating vs stapling for hemiepiphysiodesis
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS
Similar treatment time and pain in tension-band plating vs stapling for hemiepiphysiodesis .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(8):18 Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):202-6. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.782526. Epub 2013 Mar 14

The present trial evaluated 20 children with idiopathic genu valgum (IGV) who were randomized for hemiepiphysiodesis with either a tension band construct or staples to correct angular deformities. To compare the efficiency of both treatment methods, the time for correction of deformity, changes in angles as measured on radiographs, pain by visual analog scale (VAS) and analgesic consumption were recorded. The post-operative results indicated no differences between using staples and tension band plating for all outcomes.


Publication Funding Details +
Funding:
Non-Industry funded
Sponsor:
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and the Central Denmark Region
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Risk of Bias

6/10

Reporting Criteria

18/20

Fragility Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Yes = 1

Uncertain = 0.5

Not Relevant = 0

No = 0

The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

3/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.

Why was this study needed now?

Hemiepiphysiodesis is used to correct excessive angular deformities in the extremities of children. Implants stop unilateral growth until the deformity is corrected and are then removed to resume growth. Staples have been used for this procedure, but are associated with complications such as staple migration, breakage, and premature growth plate closure. More recently, tension-band plating has been introduced for faster correction and prevention of growth plate compression. However, no known randomized trial has demonstrated superiority of tension-band plating technique over stapling.

What was the principal research question?

How do the clinical and radiographic effects of stapling compare to tension-band plating in children with IGV of the distal femur?

Study Characteristics +
Population:
26 children with idiopathic genu valgum, aged 8-15 years, with limited daily activities, at least 7 cm of intermalleolar distance, and at least 6 months of estimated remaining growth.
Intervention:
Tension-band group: 1 plate with 2 cannulated screws was placed spanning the growth plate (8-plate system; 16-mm titanium plate and 32-mm cannulated titanium screws; Orthofix, McKinney, TX) (n = 10). The children were slightly younger (mean age 10.1 (range 8-14) years). M/F= 8/2
Comparison:
Staple Group: 3 staples were placed across the physis of the femoral growth plate (chromium-cobalt steel, Large; Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN) (n = 10). The mean age was 11.1 (range 6-13) years at time of surgery. M/F = 3/7
Outcomes:
Outcomes: Time to correction of the deformity, changes in angles on long standing radiographs, visual analog scale (VAS) pain for the first 72 hours, analgesic use
Methods:
RCT; Single Center
Time:
Radiographs 14 days after surgery and regular visits thereafter with minimum 3 months between each
What were the important findings?
  • The tension band group and staples group had similar time taken to correct idiopathic genu valgum deformity (mean 340 days (286–394) vs. mean 349 days (263–435), respectively) (p=0.8). Cohen’s delta showed an estimated effect size of 0.075.
  • No implant failures, infection or growth arrests occurred, while all 20 children achieved correction of genu valgum deformity.
  • Although groups differed in gender (M/F in staples group = 3/7 vs tension band = 8/2) and age (tension band group mean age = 10.1 ( 8–14 years) vs. staples group mean age = 11.1 (6–13) years), there were no differences in treatment time, preoperative intermalleolar distance, and measured radiographic values (LDFA, MPTA, and MAD) treatment (p>0.05).
  • VAS pain was recorded for 18/20 children and was similar in both groups (p>0.05) 72 hours postoperatively.
  • 1 child in tension-band group had a rebound of intermalliolar distance of 8 cm and was scheduled for surgery
What should I remember most?

Hemiepiphysiodesis with both tension band and staples have similar treatment time and angle correction of idiopathic genu valgum.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

The trial was not able to show superiority of either hemiepiphysiodesis methods. Further studies with larger populations need to be conducted as this study may be underpowered.

DISCLAIMER

This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.

0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Your account will be affiliated with
and includes free access to OrthoEvidence


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

How to cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Similar treatment time and pain in tension-band plating vs stapling for hemiepiphysiodesis. OE Journal. 2013;1(8):18. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/similar-treatment-time-and-pain-in-tension-band-plating-vs-stapling-for-hemiepiphysiodesis

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report