Robot-assisted vs. Conventional Fluoroscopic-Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement in Spine Surgery .
Comparison of accuracy and safety between robot-assisted and conventional fluoroscope assisted placement of pedicle screws in thoracolumbar spine: A meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 24;100(38): e27282.Thirteen randomized controlled trials containing a total of 4727 patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery were included in this meta-analysis comparing robot-assisted pedicle screw placement and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement. The pooled outcomes of interest included accuracy of screw placement, adverse events, facet joint invasion rate, revision, and fluoroscopy time. Results of the meta-analysis demonstrated significantly greater pooled screw placement accuracy, lower facet joint invasion rate, and lower revision rate in the robot-assisted group.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
