Percutaneous vs Open Fixation for Isolated Medial Malleolar Fractures
Percutaneous versus open cannulated screws fixation for displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures in adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2025 Jul 25;145(1):385.Fifty seven patients with displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures were randomized to receive closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (n=28) or open reduction and internal fixation (n=29), both using two partially threaded 4-mm cannulated screws. The primary outcomes were time to radiographic union and complication incidence. Secondary outcomes included FAAM-ADL, FAAM-Sports, AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, and pain (VAS). Outcomes were assessed at scheduled visits to 12 months, with final follow-up 12–24 months (mean ≈17 months). Overall, the results revealed no between-group differences in FAAM, AOFAS, or VAS at final follow-up, while percutaneous fixation achieved slightly faster union and fewer superficial infections; operative time was also shorter with the percutaneous approach. These findings suggest percutaneous fixation is a reasonable alternative to open surgery for displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics