Abduction Neutral-Rotation Brace vs Sling After Rotator Cuff Repair
Comparison of abduction neutral rotation brace versus conventional arm sling following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol . 2025 Jul 11;35(1):300.Thirty two patients with full-thickness posterosuperior rotator cuff tears were randomized to immobilization with an abduction neutral-rotation brace (n=16 analyzed) or a conventional arm sling (n=16). The primary outcomes were passive shoulder ROM (forward flexion, external rotation, internal rotation) measured serially; secondary outcomes were pain (VAS) and Constant–Murley Score (CMS). Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months. Overall, the results revealed better early ROM (e.g., forward flexion and external rotation at 3 months) and lower pain at 6 weeks with the brace, while 12-month ROM converged and CMS was only modestly higher in the brace group at 12 months. These findings suggest abduction-neutral immobilization facilitates earlier recovery without added complications.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics