HAND & WRIST
Comparison between Carbon-Peek volar locking plates and titanium volar locking plates in the treatment of distal radius fractures
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2018;6(10):3 Injury. 2017 Oct;48 Suppl 3:S24-S2930 patients undergoing volar plate fixation for an AO type B or C displaced fracture of the distal radius were included in this study to compare two different plates. Patients were randomized to undergo the procedure using either Carbon-Peek volar locking plates or titanium volar locking plates. Follow-up was conducted over a 12-month period and patients were evaluated for forearm range of motion, hand grip strength, key pinch strength, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and a visual analog scale. Dorso-palmar and lateral x-rays were also used to assess radiographic parameters. The results of this study at 12 months indicated no significant differences in functional outcome or radiographic outcome between the two plates.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
3/4
Randomization
2/4
Outcome Measurements
3/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
4/5
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
The distal radius is one of the most common bones to be fractured, particularly among older adults. Volar plating is a widely used method of fixation for these injuries. Most plates are constructed of a titanium alloy, but more recently, a plate composed of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) has been introduced.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
In volar plate fixation of a distal radius fracture, is there any significant difference in functional outcome or radiographic outcome between cases completed using a carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone and cases completed using a titanium plate, assessed over a minimum of 12-month follow-up
重要な知見は？
- Mean DASH at final follow-up did not significantly differ between the CFR-PEEK group (15.3) and the titanium group (12.2) (p>0.05).
- Mean VAS score at final follow-up did not significantly differ between the CFR-PEEK group (3.6) and the titanium group (2.9) (p>0.05).
- Mean range of motion at final follow-up did not significantly differ between the CFR-PEEK group and the titanium group (p>0.05).
- No significant differences in radiographic parameters were recorded between groups at final follow-up.
- No complications were recorded in either group.
最も覚えておくべきことは？
In volar plating of a displaced distal radius fracture, no significant differences in functional outcome or radiographic outcome were noted between plates composed of carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone and titanium plates after a minimum of 1 year.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
The results of this study suggest that similar outcomes are achieved by the CFR-PEEK volar plate to that of the more standard titanium plate for fixation of displaced distal radius fractures.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
