ACE Report Cover
Internet-based randomized trials successful and economical tool in low risk interventions
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
SPINE
Internet-based randomized trials successful and economical tool in low risk interventions .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(2):158 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Jan 11;9:4.

140 participants, >18 years of age, with spondyloarthropathy (SpA) were randomized to receive either a probiotic drink or a placebo over a 12 week period. The probiotic drinks were not any superior in improving well-being or bowel symptoms. Internet-based randomized controlled trial was a suitable economical method with a potential applicability in examining the complementary and alternative medicine interventions at low cost.


Publication Funding Details +
Funding:
Industry funded
Sponsor:
NASS
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Risk of Bias

7/10

Reporting Criteria

19/20

Fragility Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Yes = 1

Uncertain = 0.5

Not Relevant = 0

No = 0

The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.

Why was this study needed now?

Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) are used in chronic and acute health conditions for maintaining wellness. However, the use of CAMs is limited, since there have not been many clinical trials performed on CAMs. This study evaluated the effectiveness of probiotics in the symptom control of spondyloarthropathy.

What was the principal research question?

Is the probiotic use superior to placebo in terms of well-being, bowel symptoms, and arthritis severity (disease activity and function) after 12 weeks of treatment?

Study Characteristics +
Population:
140 participants, >18 years of age (mean age 43.7 yr) with a diagnosis of spondyloarthropathy (SpA), residents of UK and having access to the internet.
Intervention:
Probiotic Group: Patients were administered 4 stains of live bacteria taken daily for 3 months (10 g lyophilized powder containing live bacteria: Lactobacillus salivarius (CUL61) 6.25 × 109 cfu (colony forming units), Lactobacilllus paracasei (CUL08) 1.25 × 109cfu, Bifidobacterium infantis (CUL34) 1.25 × 109 cfuand Bifidobacterium bifidum (CUL20) 1.25 × 109 cfu) (n=71; 49M 16F; 69 analyzed at final follow-up)
Comparison:
Placebo Group: 10 g maltodextrin taken daily for 3 months (n=76; 45M 24F; 65 analyzed at final follow-up)
Outcomes:
Primary outcome measure: CONSORT statement fulfillment Secondary outcome measure: Well-being on VAS Score, bowel symptoms (diarrhoea, stomach pain, blood in stools), and arthritis severity [disease activity (pain, discomfort, morning stiffness, fatigue and tenderness, all averaged to give a composite score) and function]
Methods:
Prospective; Double-blind; RCT
Time:
Weekly assessments for 3 months
What were the important findings?
  • 65% (96/147) completed the entire 3 month long trial.
  • CAM Outcome: No clinically significant differences were observed in the global well-being, bowel symptoms, or severity of arthritis between the two groups.
  • Adherence to medication was comparable in both the groups, placebo=3938/5796 (67.9%) and intervention group= 3748/5544 (67.6%).
  • No difference in the adverse event rates between the groups were recorded
What should I remember most?

Internet-based tools were useful and economical for conducting a successful randomized controlled trials in low risk interventions. The probiotic did not improve well-being, disease activity, or function compared to placebo.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

The internet-based RCT is a feasible method to examine the CAM intervention. it is also is a cost-effective approach for assessing low-risk interventions.

DISCLAIMER

This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.

0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Your account will be affiliated with
and includes free access to OrthoEvidence


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

How to cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Internet-based randomized trials successful and economical tool in low risk interventions. OE Journal. 2013;1(2):158. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/internet-based-randomized-trials-successful-and-economical-tool-in-low-risk-interventions

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report