ACE Report Cover
Internal Fixation vs Functional Bracing for Treatment of Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
TRAUMA
Internal Fixation vs Functional Bracing for Treatment of Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures .
High Impact
This study has been identified as potentially high impact. OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself. Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone. This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.

Effect of Surgery vs Functional Bracing on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures: The FISH Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1792-1801.

Eighty-two patients with closed, displaced humeral shaft fractures were randomized to receive an open reduction and internal plate fixation procedure or functional bracing. The primary outcome of interest was the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores at 12 months. Secondary outcomes of interest included pain scores at rest and during activities on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Constant-Murley scores, elbow range of motion, 15D quality of life scores, and patient satisfaction outcomes. Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months post-treatment. Results revealed significantly favourable DASH scores, pain scores during activity, Constant-Murley scores, elbow range of motion, DASH work module scores, and patient satisfaction with shoulder function and upper limb function in the surgery group compared to the bracing group. However at 12 months post-operation, no significant differences in all outcomes were observed between the two groups, with exception of DASH sports module scores which were significantly in favour of the surgery group. At 12 months, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the surgery group were willing to repeat the same treatment compared to the bracing group.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Internal Fixation vs Functional Bracing for Treatment of Closed Displaced Humeral Shaft Fractures. ACE Report. 2020;9(6):12. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/internal-fixation-vs-functional-bracing-for-treatment-of-closed-displaced-humeral-shaft-fractures

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report