Comparison of Iliac and Femoral Autograft Practices in Pemberton Pelvic Osteotomy
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2021;9(4):13 J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jan;41(1):46-50.What this means for my practice?
The results of this randomized controlled study suggest that in patients with developmental hip dysplasia who are treated with Pemberton pelvic osteotomy, a femoral graft compared to using an iliac graft may help improve blood loss and loss of graft height up to 3 months post-treatment. However, the time to graft union may be statistically significantly shorter when using the iliac graft vs femoral graft after a pelvic osteotomy. The results of this study were limited by the lack of blinding of outcome assessors. Moreover, the sample size was small with 50 patients; thus, future larger randomized controlled trials are needed.
Resumo do estudo
Fifty patients (60 hips) aged >18 months to 6 years old with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) scheduled for an open reduction, Pemberton pelvic osteotomy (PPO), and femoral shortening osteotomy were randomized to receive either iliac autograft (n=30 hips) or femoral autograft (n=30 hips) after PPO. Outcomes of interest included the following: acetabular index angle (AIA), time of surgery, mean blood loss, mean time to graft union, mean graft height and width, mean loss of graft height and width, and the incidence of complications (i.e. loss of graft position, graft resorption). AIA was evaluated at 1-day, 45-days, and 1-year post-surgery, whilst mean graft height, was assessed at 45-days and 1-year post-surgery. All other outcomes, excluding mean loss of graft height which was evaluated at 90-days follow-up, were measured peri-operatively. Results of this study demonstrated that the mean AIA, mean surgical time, and incidence of adverse events were not statistically significantly different between the two graft groups (p>0.05 for all). Furthermore, mean peri-operative graft width, mean graft height, mean loss of graft height, and mean blood loss were all statistically significantly in favour of the femoral autograft group (p<0.001 for all). Yet, mean time to graft union was statistically significantly in favour of the iliac autograft group (p=0.0001). Two patients experienced loss of graft position, and 1 patient experienced graft resorption. No cases of superficial/deep infections, neurovascular injury, or nonunion at the osteotomy line were observed in either group.
Desbloqueie o relatório completo da ACE
Tem acesso a 4 mais artigos GRATUITOS este mês.
Clique abaixo para desbloquear e ver este ACE Reports
Desbloqueie agora
Avaliações críticas dos mais recentes ensaios clínicos aleatórios de alto impacto e revisões sistemáticas em ortopedia
Acesso ao conteúdo do podcast OrthoEvidence, incluindo colaborações com o Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas com cirurgiões reconhecidos internacionalmente e discussões em mesa redonda sobre notícias e tópicos ortopédicos
Subscrição do The Pulse, um boletim informativo duas vezes por semana baseado em evidências, concebido para o ajudar a tomar melhores decisões clínicas
Acesso exclusivo a artigos de conteúdo original, incluindo revisões sistemáticas internas e artigos sobre métodos de investigação em saúde e tópicos ortopédicos importantes
Ou actualize hoje e obtenha acesso a todo o conteúdo da OrthoEvidence por apenas $1,99 por semana.
Já tem uma conta? Inicie sessão
Está afiliado a uma das nossas associações parceiras?
Clique aqui para obter acesso gratuito como parte dos benefícios de membro da sua associação!
Subscreva a "O Pulso"
Ortopedia baseada em evidências diretamente para a sua caixa de correio. SUBSCREVA-SE