Comparison of Iliac and Femoral Autograft Practices in Pemberton Pelvic Osteotomy
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2021;9(4):13 J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Jan;41(1):46-50.What this means for my practice?
The results of this randomized controlled study suggest that in patients with developmental hip dysplasia who are treated with Pemberton pelvic osteotomy, a femoral graft compared to using an iliac graft may help improve blood loss and loss of graft height up to 3 months post-treatment. However, the time to graft union may be statistically significantly shorter when using the iliac graft vs femoral graft after a pelvic osteotomy. The results of this study were limited by the lack of blinding of outcome assessors. Moreover, the sample size was small with 50 patients; thus, future larger randomized controlled trials are needed.
Study Summary
Fifty patients (60 hips) aged >18 months to 6 years old with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) scheduled for an open reduction, Pemberton pelvic osteotomy (PPO), and femoral shortening osteotomy were randomized to receive either iliac autograft (n=30 hips) or femoral autograft (n=30 hips) after PPO. Outcomes of interest included the following: acetabular index angle (AIA), time of surgery, mean blood loss, mean time to graft union, mean graft height and width, mean loss of graft height and width, and the incidence of complications (i.e. loss of graft position, graft resorption). AIA was evaluated at 1-day, 45-days, and 1-year post-surgery, whilst mean graft height, was assessed at 45-days and 1-year post-surgery. All other outcomes, excluding mean loss of graft height which was evaluated at 90-days follow-up, were measured peri-operatively. Results of this study demonstrated that the mean AIA, mean surgical time, and incidence of adverse events were not statistically significantly different between the two graft groups (p>0.05 for all). Furthermore, mean peri-operative graft width, mean graft height, mean loss of graft height, and mean blood loss were all statistically significantly in favour of the femoral autograft group (p<0.001 for all). Yet, mean time to graft union was statistically significantly in favour of the iliac autograft group (p=0.0001). Two patients experienced loss of graft position, and 1 patient experienced graft resorption. No cases of superficial/deep infections, neurovascular injury, or nonunion at the osteotomy line were observed in either group.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!