COA 2024: Safety Profile of Bankart Repair vs Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction .
AAGR vs. Bankart and Remplissage: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety Profiles
One hundred fifty-three patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation were randomized to receive either arthroscopic Bankart repair (n=80) or arthroscopic Bankart repair plus Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction (AAGR; n=73). The outcomes of interest included the incidence of intra-operative, perioperative, and postoperative complications within one year. Overall, the results of the study revealed that AAGR had a significantly lower rate of re-dislocation (1.4%) compared to the Bankart repair group (15%, p=0.003). No intra-operative or perioperative complications were reported in either group. This suggests that AAGR is as safe as Bankart repair while potentially offering better stability.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
