ACE Report Cover
Chronic Back Pain: 'Back School Programme' improves short-term quality of life
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
SPINE
Chronic Back Pain: 'Back School Programme' improves short-term quality of life .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(11):243 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Feb 28;8:21.
Autori che hanno contribuito

SS Tavafian A Jamshidi K Mohammed A Montazeri

102 female patients suffering from chronic back pain were randomized to either an intervention group receiving a 'Back School Programme' in combination with medication, or to a control group only receiving medication. This study aimed to compare improvements in quality of life between groups. The results at 3 months indicated that the 'Back School Programme' intervention was successful in improving physical and mental health related measures, and could improve patients' quality of life.


Dettagli sul finanziamento della pubblicazione +
Finanziamento:
Non-funded
Conflitti:
None disclosed

Rischio di pregiudizio

5/10

Criteri di segnalazione

13/20

Indice di fragilità

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sì = 1

Incerto = 0,5

Non rilevante = 0

No = 0

La valutazione dei criteri di segnalazione valuta la trasparenza con cui gli autori riportano le caratteristiche metodologiche e sperimentali dello studio all'interno della pubblicazione. La valutazione è suddivisa in cinque categorie che vengono presentate di seguito.

1/4

Randomization

1/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

L'Indice di Fragilità è uno strumento che aiuta l'interpretazione dei risultati significativi, fornendo una misura della forza di un risultato. L'Indice di Fragilità rappresenta il numero di eventi consecutivi che devono essere aggiunti a un risultato dicotomico per rendere il risultato non più significativo. Un numero piccolo rappresenta un risultato più debole, mentre un numero grande rappresenta un risultato più forte.

Perché questo studio era necessario ora?

Individuals with chronic back pain experience many debilitating physical disruptions, including increased pain, decreased muscle tone and overall health, as well as psychological dysfunction, and decreased social interaction. Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate possible interventions that address back pain, one of which, is the Back School Programme. It has been suggested that this programme may reduce back pain, improve function, and expedite return to work. However, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating the efficacy of this programme. This study was needed to examine how the Back School Programme affects health related quality of life measures.

Qual era la domanda di ricerca principale?

Does the 'Back School Programme' intervention improve quality of life in patients suffering from chronic back pain, over a 3 month period?

Caratteristiche dello studio +
Population:
102 women, over the age of 18 years, with chronic back pain lasting for at least 90 days.
Intervention:
Education Group: Patients received the 'Back School Programme', as well as medication (Acetaminophen, NSAID, Chlordiazepoxide). This 'Back School Programme' intervention was four days in length, consisting of five sessions, with the end goal of helping patients attain a healthy functioning level. Patients were empowered to achieve their own goals with the help of a clinical psychologist, PhD level educator (to provide advice about healthy lifestyle habits), rheumatologist (to educate patient regarding anatomy of spine and proper movements), as well as a physical therapist. Patients in this group received an additional interdisciplinary evaluation and an educational intervention lasting four days. (n=50; Mean age: 42.9 +/- 10.7 years)
Comparison:
Control Group: Patients in clinic group received medication under physician supervision (Acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], Chlordiazepoxide). (n=52; Mean age: 44.7 +/- 10.8 years)
Outcomes:
The main outcome of this study was quality of life (measured by any increase in quality of life score on the Short Form Health Survey [SF-36; 0-100], compared to baseline). Eight subscales of the SF-36 were assessed: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE) and mental health (MH).
Methods:
RCT
Time:
Data was collected at admission and again at end of the 3 month study period.
Quali erano i risultati importanti?
  • With regards to baseline data, there were no significant differences between both groups (p>0.05).
  • Over the 3 month study period, the education group showed significant improvements for all subscales of the quality of life questionnaire/Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (p<0.001).
  • In the control group receiving medication, there were only significant improvements on 3 subscales: bodily pain (p=0.001), vitality (p=0.02), and mental health (p=0.04). These findings were less significant than the resulting improvements seen in the 'Back School Programme' group.
Che cosa devo ricordare di più?

Patients participating in the 'Back School Programme' enjoyed significantly greater improvements in quality of life measures (all 8 SF-36 subscales) compared to those only receiving medication.

Come influenzerà l'assistenza ai miei pazienti?

Th results of this study indicated that both physical functioning, as well as mental health can be significantly improved with the 'Back School Programme' in patients with chronic low back pain. Further studies are needed to examine the long-term effects and to further investigate the efficacy of this education programme.

DISCLAIMER

Il contenuto di questa pagina è solo a scopo informativo e non intende sostituire la consulenza, la diagnosi o il trattamento medico professionale. Se ha bisogno di cure mediche, si rivolga sempre al suo medico o al pronto soccorso più vicino. Le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista espressi dalle persone sui contenuti presenti in questa pagina non riflettono le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista di OrthoEvidence.

0 di 4 articoli mensili GRATUITI sbloccati
Ha raggiunto il suo limite di 4 visualizzazioni di articoli gratuiti questo mese

Accesso a OrthoEvidence a soli 1,99 dollari a settimana.

Rimanga in contatto con le ultime prove. Può disdire in qualsiasi momento.
  • Valutazioni critiche dei più recenti studi randomizzati controllati ad alto impatto e delle revisioni sistematiche in ortopedia.
  • Accesso ai contenuti del podcast OrthoEvidence, tra cui collaborazioni con il Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviste con chirurghi di fama internazionale e tavole rotonde su notizie e argomenti ortopedici.
  • Abbonamento a The Pulse, una newsletter bisettimanale basata sulle evidenze scientifiche, progettata per aiutarla a prendere decisioni cliniche migliori.
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bentornato!
Ha dimenticato la password?
Inizi la sua prova gratuita oggi stesso!

Il suo account sarà affiliato a
e includerà l'accesso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
Ha dimenticato la password?

O
Controlli la sua e-mail

Se esiste un account con l'indirizzo e-mail fornito, le verrà inviata un'e-mail di reimpostazione della password. Se non vede l'e-mail, controlli la cartella spam o posta indesiderata.

Per ulteriore assistenza, contatti il nostro team di supporto.

Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Tradurre il Rapporto ACE

OrthoEvidence utilizza un servizio di traduzione di terze parti per rendere i contenuti accessibili in più lingue. Si prega di notare che, sebbene venga fatto ogni sforzo per garantire l'accuratezza, le traduzioni potrebbero non essere sempre perfette.

Come citare questo documento ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Chronic Back Pain: 'Back School Programme' improves short-term quality of life. OE Journal. 2013;1(11):243. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/chronic-back-pain-back-school-programme-improves-short-term-quality-of-life

Copiare la citazione
Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Funzionalità per i membri Premium

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence Premium.

Condividi questo articolo ACE Report