ACE Report Cover
Chronic Back Pain: 'Back School Programme' improves short-term quality of life
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descargar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descargar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
SPINE
Chronic Back Pain: 'Back School Programme' improves short-term quality of life .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(11):243 BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Feb 28;8:21.

102 female patients suffering from chronic back pain were randomized to either an intervention group receiving a 'Back School Programme' in combination with medication, or to a control group only receiving medication. This study aimed to compare improvements in quality of life between groups. The results at 3 months indicated that the 'Back School Programme' intervention was successful in improving physical and mental health related measures, and could improve patients' quality of life.


Detalles de la financiación de la publicación +
Financiación:
Non-funded
Conflictos:
None disclosed

Riesgo de sesgo

5/10

Criterios de información

13/20

Índice de fragilidad

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sí = 1

Incierto = 0,5

No relevante = 0

No = 0

La evaluación de los criterios de información evalúa la transparencia con la que los autores informan de las características metodológicas y del ensayo dentro de la publicación. La evaluación se divide en cinco categorías que se presentan a continuación.

1/4

Randomization

1/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

El Índice de Fragilidad es una herramienta que ayuda en la interpretación de hallazgos significativos, proporcionando una medida de fuerza para un resultado. El Índice de Fragilidad representa el número de eventos consecutivos que es necesario añadir a un resultado dicotómico para que el hallazgo deje de ser significativo. Un número pequeño representa un hallazgo más débil y un número grande un hallazgo más fuerte.

¿Por qué se necesitaba ahora este estudio?

Individuals with chronic back pain experience many debilitating physical disruptions, including increased pain, decreased muscle tone and overall health, as well as psychological dysfunction, and decreased social interaction. Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate possible interventions that address back pain, one of which, is the Back School Programme. It has been suggested that this programme may reduce back pain, improve function, and expedite return to work. However, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating the efficacy of this programme. This study was needed to examine how the Back School Programme affects health related quality of life measures.

¿Cuál era la pregunta principal de la investigación?

Does the 'Back School Programme' intervention improve quality of life in patients suffering from chronic back pain, over a 3 month period?

Características del estudio +
Población:
102 women, over the age of 18 years, with chronic back pain lasting for at least 90 days.
Intervención:
Education Group: Patients received the 'Back School Programme', as well as medication (Acetaminophen, NSAID, Chlordiazepoxide). This 'Back School Programme' intervention was four days in length, consisting of five sessions, with the end goal of helping patients attain a healthy functioning level. Patients were empowered to achieve their own goals with the help of a clinical psychologist, PhD level educator (to provide advice about healthy lifestyle habits), rheumatologist (to educate patient regarding anatomy of spine and proper movements), as well as a physical therapist. Patients in this group received an additional interdisciplinary evaluation and an educational intervention lasting four days. (n=50; Mean age: 42.9 +/- 10.7 years)
Comparación:
Control Group: Patients in clinic group received medication under physician supervision (Acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], Chlordiazepoxide). (n=52; Mean age: 44.7 +/- 10.8 years)
Resultados:
The main outcome of this study was quality of life (measured by any increase in quality of life score on the Short Form Health Survey [SF-36; 0-100], compared to baseline). Eight subscales of the SF-36 were assessed: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE) and mental health (MH).
Métodos:
RCT
Tiempo:
Data was collected at admission and again at end of the 3 month study period.
¿Cuáles fueron los hallazgos importantes?
  • With regards to baseline data, there were no significant differences between both groups (p>0.05).
  • Over the 3 month study period, the education group showed significant improvements for all subscales of the quality of life questionnaire/Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) (p<0.001).
  • In the control group receiving medication, there were only significant improvements on 3 subscales: bodily pain (p=0.001), vitality (p=0.02), and mental health (p=0.04). These findings were less significant than the resulting improvements seen in the 'Back School Programme' group.
¿Qué es lo que más debo recordar?

Patients participating in the 'Back School Programme' enjoyed significantly greater improvements in quality of life measures (all 8 SF-36 subscales) compared to those only receiving medication.

¿Cómo afectará esto al cuidado de mis pacientes?

Th results of this study indicated that both physical functioning, as well as mental health can be significantly improved with the 'Back School Programme' in patients with chronic low back pain. Further studies are needed to examine the long-term effects and to further investigate the efficacy of this education programme.

DESCARGO DE RESPONSABILIDAD

El contenido de esta página tiene únicamente fines informativos y no pretende sustituir el consejo, diagnóstico o tratamiento médico profesional. Si necesita tratamiento médico, busque siempre el consejo de su médico o acuda al servicio de urgencias más cercano. Las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista expresados por las personas sobre el contenido que se encuentra en esta página no reflejan las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista de OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 artículos mensuales GRATIS desbloqueados
Ha alcanzado su límite de vistas de 4 artículos gratuitos este mes

Acceda a OrtoEvidencia por tan sólo 1,99 $ a la semana.

Manténgase conectado con las últimas pruebas. Cancele en cualquier momento.
  • Valoraciones críticas de los últimos ensayos controlados aleatorizados de gran impacto y revisiones sistemáticas en ortopedia
  • Acceso al contenido del podcast OrthoEvidence, que incluye colaboraciones con el Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas con cirujanos reconocidos internacionalmente y mesas redondas sobre noticias y temas ortopédicos
  • Suscripción a The Pulse, un boletín quincenal basado en la evidencia y diseñado para ayudarle a tomar mejores decisiones clínicas
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bienvenido
¿Ha olvidado su contraseña?
Comience hoy mismo su prueba GRATUITA

Su cuenta estará afiliada a
e incluye acceso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
¿Olvidó su contraseña?

O
Compruebe su correo electrónico

Si existe una cuenta con la dirección de correo electrónico proporcionada, se le enviará un correo electrónico para restablecer la contraseña. Si no ve el correo electrónico, compruebe su carpeta de correo no deseado o spam.

Si necesita más ayuda póngase en contacto con nuestro equipo de asistencia.

Inicie sesión para activar esta función

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta activa de OrthoEvidence. Por favor, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta de prueba GRATUITA.

Traducir Informe ACE

OrthoEvidence utiliza un servicio de traducción de terceros para que el contenido sea accesible en varios idiomas. Tenga en cuenta que, aunque se hace todo lo posible para garantizar la exactitud, las traducciones no siempre son perfectas.

Cómo citar esto ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Chronic Back Pain: 'Back School Programme' improves short-term quality of life. OE Journal. 2013;1(11):243. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/chronic-back-pain-back-school-programme-improves-short-term-quality-of-life

Copiar cita
Inicie sesión para activar esta función

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta activa de OrthoEvidence. Por favor, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta de prueba GRATUITA.

Función de miembro Premium

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta Premium de OrthoEvidence.

Compartir ACE Report