ARTHROPLASTY
Tranexamic acid and the reduction of blood loss in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
この研究はハイインパクトの可能性があります。
OEのAI駆動型ハイインパクト指標は、論文が掲載されたジャーナルと論文自体の科学的内容の両方からのシグナルを統合することで、論文が持つ可能性の高い影響力を推定します。
最先端の自然言語処理を用いて開発されたOEハイインパクトモデルは、ジャーナルのインパクトファクターのみよりも、研究の将来の引用実績をより正確に予測します。
これにより、臨床的に意義のある研究をより早く認識することが可能になり、読者は将来の診療を形成する可能性が最も高い論文に集中することができます。
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(10):12 BMC Res Notes. 2013 May 7;6:184. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-18433 RCTs (1,957 patients), reporting the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty compared to a control, were selected in this meta-analysis. The findings calculating the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing in blood loss, number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusions, and risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) indicated better outcomes in favour of tranexamic acid for both THA and TKA.
Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?
Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?
Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?
Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?
Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?
Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?
Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?
Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?
Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?
How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
4/4
Introduction
3/4
Accessing Data
4/4
Analysing Data
3/4
Results
3/4
Discussion
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
With the increasing number of TKAs and THAs being performed, the issue of blood loss and subsequent high risk of blood transfusions is an increasingly important issue. Substantial blood loss can lead to postoperative anemia, infections, cardiopulmonary events, and increased costs. To counteract these effects, tranexamic acid (TXA), applied topically or intravenously, has been used in many surgeries, but it's risk of causing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is of some concern. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of TXA in reducing blood loss and allogenic transfusion requirements without causing DVT.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Does tranexamic acid (TXA) reduce total blood loss and number of patients requiring allogenic blood transfusions, compared to a control, in patients undergoing THA and TKA?
重要な知見は？
- In 14 studies with TKA, the combined total blood loss favoured TXA patients, WMD = -1.149 (p < 0.001; 95% CI −1.298 to -1.000). The heterogeneity of these results was high (p = 0.000, I2 = 85.710). After sensitivity analysis considering heterogeneity, TXA showed superiority over control; WMD = −1.706 (p < 0.001, 95% CI −1.949 to-1.463).
- In 12 studies with THA, the combined total blood loss also favoured TXA, WMD = −0.504 (p<0.001; 95% CI, -0.672, -0.336). A moderate level of heterogeneity was found (p = 0.006, I2 = 58.000).
- In 16 studies with TKA, the combined OR of number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusions was 0.145 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.094, 0.223) in favour of TXA group. The results were homogenous (p =0.801, I2 = 0.000).
- In 10 studies with THA, the combined OR for number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusions was 0.327 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.208, 0.515) in favour of TXA. The heterogeneity of the results was moderate (p = 0.135, I2 = 34.089).
- In 7 studies with TKA, the combined OR of number of patients who developed DVT was 1.030 (p = 0.946; 95% CI, 0.439, 2.420), showing no increase in DVT incidences with TXA use. The results were homogenous (p =0.615, I2 = 0.000).
- In 5 studies with THA, the combined OR for the number of patients who developed a DVT was 1.070 (p = 0.895; 95% CI, 0.393, 2.911), showing no increase in DVT incidences with TXA use. The results were homogenous (p =0.677, I2 = 0.000).
- In TXA groups, 30 DVT, 3 pulmonary embolisms (PE), 1 myocardial infarction, 3 wound infections, 9 wound hematomas, and 1 chest infection occurred. In control groups 20 DVT, 4 PE, 5 wound infections, and 6 wound hematomas occurred.
最も覚えておくべきことは？
The use of TXA significantly reduced the total blood loss and number of patients requiring blood allogeneic blood transfusions after THA and TKA, without an increased risk of thromboembolic complications.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
The study supports the use of TXA in major surgeries such as TKA and THA. However, more meta-analyses with poolable data regarding thromboembolic complications are needed to confirm these findings.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
