Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusions in TKA and THA .
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(10):12 BMC Res Notes. 2013 May 7;6:184. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-18433 RCTs (1,957 patients), reporting the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty compared to a control, were selected in this meta-analysis. The findings calculating the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing in blood loss, number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusions, and risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) indicated better outcomes in favour of tranexamic acid for both THA and TKA.
Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?
Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?
Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?
Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?
Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?
Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?
Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?
Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?
Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?
How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?
Yes = 1
Uncertain = 0.5
Not Relevant = 0
No = 0
The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.
4/4
Introduction
3/4
Accessing Data
4/4
Analysing Data
3/4
Results
3/4
Discussion
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.
Why was this study needed now?
With the increasing number of TKAs and THAs being performed, the issue of blood loss and subsequent high risk of blood transfusions is an increasingly important issue. Substantial blood loss can lead to postoperative anemia, infections, cardiopulmonary events, and increased costs. To counteract these effects, tranexamic acid (TXA), applied topically or intravenously, has been used in many surgeries, but it's risk of causing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is of some concern. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of TXA in reducing blood loss and allogenic transfusion requirements without causing DVT.
What was the principal research question?
Does tranexamic acid (TXA) reduce total blood loss and number of patients requiring allogenic blood transfusions, compared to a control, in patients undergoing THA and TKA?
- In 14 studies with TKA, the combined total blood loss favoured TXA patients, WMD = -1.149 (p < 0.001; 95% CI −1.298 to -1.000). The heterogeneity of these results was high (p = 0.000, I2 = 85.710). After sensitivity analysis considering heterogeneity, TXA showed superiority over control; WMD = −1.706 (p < 0.001, 95% CI −1.949 to-1.463).
- In 12 studies with THA, the combined total blood loss also favoured TXA, WMD = −0.504 (p<0.001; 95% CI, -0.672, -0.336). A moderate level of heterogeneity was found (p = 0.006, I2 = 58.000).
- In 16 studies with TKA, the combined OR of number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusions was 0.145 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.094, 0.223) in favour of TXA group. The results were homogenous (p =0.801, I2 = 0.000).
- In 10 studies with THA, the combined OR for number of patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusions was 0.327 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.208, 0.515) in favour of TXA. The heterogeneity of the results was moderate (p = 0.135, I2 = 34.089).
- In 7 studies with TKA, the combined OR of number of patients who developed DVT was 1.030 (p = 0.946; 95% CI, 0.439, 2.420), showing no increase in DVT incidences with TXA use. The results were homogenous (p =0.615, I2 = 0.000).
- In 5 studies with THA, the combined OR for the number of patients who developed a DVT was 1.070 (p = 0.895; 95% CI, 0.393, 2.911), showing no increase in DVT incidences with TXA use. The results were homogenous (p =0.677, I2 = 0.000).
- In TXA groups, 30 DVT, 3 pulmonary embolisms (PE), 1 myocardial infarction, 3 wound infections, 9 wound hematomas, and 1 chest infection occurred. In control groups 20 DVT, 4 PE, 5 wound infections, and 6 wound hematomas occurred.
What should I remember most?
The use of TXA significantly reduced the total blood loss and number of patients requiring blood allogeneic blood transfusions after THA and TKA, without an increased risk of thromboembolic complications.
How will this affect the care of my patients?
The study supports the use of TXA in major surgeries such as TKA and THA. However, more meta-analyses with poolable data regarding thromboembolic complications are needed to confirm these findings.
DISCLAIMER
This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
