TRAUMA
Meta-analysis on the efficacy of tourniquet on ankle trauma surgery
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2014;2(7):33 Eur J Med Res. 2013 Dec 10;18:55. doi: 10.1186/2047-783X-18-553 randomized controlled trials examining the safety and efficacy of tourniquet use in ankle trauma surgery were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this review was to compare operative time, hospital stay, ankle range of motion, postoperative infection rates and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis between patients undergoing surgery with or without the use of a tourniquet. Pooled results indicated that tourniquet use in ankle trauma surgery yielded a significantly longer hospital stay and reduced ankle range of motion. Operative time, postoperative infection rates, and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis were statistically similar between groups.
Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?
Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?
Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?
Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?
Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?
Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?
Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?
Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?
Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?
How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
4/4
Introduction
4/4
Accessing Data
4/4
Analysing Data
3/4
Results
3/4
Discussion
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
Tourniquet use in orthopaedic surgery is thought to provide benefits such as improved visualization in the surgical field, shortened operative time, and minimized intraoperative blood loss. However, it may contribute to an increased risk in serious complications, such as pulmonary embolism, superficial wound infection, and acute thrombosis. Despite a number of meta-analyses having been conducted on this topic, the use of a tourniquet in orthopaedic surgery remains controversial. This meta-analysis summarized the results of randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tourniquet use in ankle trauma surgery.
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Is the use of a tourniquet safe and effective in ankle trauma surgery?
重要な知見は？
- 3 randomized controlled trials (n=166) were included in this meta-analysis. Between the three studies, 82 patients were in the tourniquet group and 84 patients were in the non-tourniquet group.
- All 3 included studies reported data on operative time (n=166). Pooled data revealed no significant difference between tourniquet and no tourniquet (MD -5.45 [95% CI -13.98, 3.09]; p=0.21). This meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, as heterogeneity was found to be significant (p=0.02; I-squared=73%).
- Pooled data from two studies (n=134) reporting hospital stay indicated that tourniquet use was significantly associated with a longer hospital stay (MD 3.17 [95% CI 1.39, 4.95]; p=0.0005). Heterogeneity was found to be insignificant (p=0.72; I-squared=0%).
- Two studies (n=134) reported ankle range of motion. Via the fixed-effect model, pooled data found a significant difference in ankle range of motion, favouring the non-tourniquet group (MD -5.25 degrees [95% CI -9.61, -0.89]; p=0.02). Heterogeneity between studies was not statistically significant (p=0.51; I-squared=0%).
- With respect to postoperative infection rates (2 studies; 134 patients), there was no significant difference with or without the use of a tourniquet (RR 1.83 [95% CI 0.65, 5.12]; p=0.25). Heterogeneity between studies was not significant for this outcome (p=0.88; I-squared=0%).
- There was no significant difference in the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (2 studies; 134 patients) between the two groups (RR 4.13 [95% CI 0.47, 36.17]; p=0.20). Heterogeneity between studies was not significant for this outcome (p=0.84; I-squared=0%)
最も覚えておくべきことは？
Tourniquet use in ankle trauma surgery resulted in significantly longer hospital stay and reduced ankle range of motion. Operative time, postoperative infection rates, and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis were statistically similar between groups.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
Results from this meta-analysis suggest that, although safe, the use of a tourniquet in ankle trauma surgery may decrease range of motion and increase length of hospital stay. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. Furthermore, future meta-analyses should perform a funnel plot analysis to assess selection bias.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
