Similar clinical results with decompression vs. decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis .
Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17849.9 studies (857 patients) were included in this meta-analysis comparing decompression plus fusion to decompression alone for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). Outcomes of interest included back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D scores, patient's satisfaction, walking ability, incidence of complications, rate of adjacent segment degeneration, reoperation rate, DS progression, operative time, blood loss, and length of stay. Results found significantly favourable pooled results for operative time, blood loss and length of stay in the decompression alone group compared to the decompression plus fusion group. In contrast, the pooled results for adjacent segment degeneration were significantly in favour of the decompression plus fusion group. Pooled results for all remaining outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics