ACE Report Cover
Prolonged use of Dalteparin for thromboprophylaxis not effective in reducing DVT incidence
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
FOOT & ANKLE
Prolonged use of Dalteparin for thromboprophylaxis not effective in reducing DVT incidence .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(11):130 Acta Orthop. 2007 Aug;78(4):528-35

272 patients undergoing surgery for ankle fractures were included in this study. All patients received 5,000 U Dalteparin subcutaneously (once per day for 7 days) starting the day after surgery. Then, patients randomized to the intervention group received 5,000 U Dalteparin, and patients randomized to the control group received placebo, for 5 weeks. Patients received treatment drugs after surgery while their lower limb was either immobilized in a plaster cast or orthosis. The results following the immobilization period indicated no differences between the two groups with respect to the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Prolonged use of Dalteparin as a method to prevent venous thromboembolism should be considered with caution.


Publication Funding Details +
Funding:
Industry funded
Sponsor:
Pharmacia- Upjohn, Pfizer Inc. and Karolinska Institutet
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Risk of Bias

5/10

Reporting Criteria

18/20

Fragility Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Yes = 1

Uncertain = 0.5

Not Relevant = 0

No = 0

The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.

2/4

Randomization

4/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.

Why was this study needed now?

The trauma, surgical procedure, and immobilization that results from orthopaedic injuries increases an individual's risk for developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT's). The incidence of ankle fractures is more than 100 per 100,00 person years. There are a few different treatments available for displaced ankle fractures including immobilization using a plaster cast, and surgery followed by immobilization in plaster cast or orthosis. No agreement has been made regarding thomboprophylaxis when the lower limb is immobilized. This study was needed to determine the effectiveness of Dalteparin as a method of thromboprophylaxis in patients with ankle fractures and subsequent immobilization.

What was the principal research question?

Does Dalteparin safely and effectively manage the risk of DVT in patients undergoing ankle fracture fixation, as evaluated against a placebo over 6 weeks?

Study Characteristics +
Population:
272 patients with an ankle fracture, waiting for surgery. All patients received 5,000 U of Dalteparin administered subcutaneously, once a day for a one week period, commencing after surgery.
Intervention:
Dalteparin Group: Patients received thromboprophylaxis with Dalteparin (5,000 U) subcutaneously for 5 weeks (n=136, 101 evaluable at final follow-up; Mean Age: 49 SD 14; M/F=62/74).
Comparison:
Placebo Group: Patients received a placebo (9% (w/v) sodium chloride) subcutaneously for a 5 week period (n=136, 96 evaluable at final follow-up; Mean AgeL 48 SD 14; M/F=62/74).
Outcomes:
The primary outcome was the number of patients in each group that had deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (measured using phlebography). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of DVT or PE. As well, adverse events (major or minor bleeding) were recorded.
Methods:
Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial; Single Centre; Double Blind
Time:
Outcomes measured on the final day that the study drug was administered (6 weeks).
What were the important findings?
  • The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism (identified by phlebography) was 21% (CI 13-29%) in the Dalteparin group and 28% (CI 19-37%) in the placebo group (p=0.25), odds ratio 0.7 (0.4-1.3).
  • 4% (CI 0-8%) of patients in the Dalteparin group, and 3% (CI 0-6%) in the placebo group had a proximal DVT. No patients had PE.
  • No major bleeding occurred in either of the groups.
What should I remember most?

The results from this study indicated that immobilization after ankle surgery often resulted in distal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There was no significant difference in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis between both groups.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

Futher studies are required to determine the effects of thromboprophylaxis for longer time periods. Prolonged use of Dalteparin as a method to prevent venous thromboembolism should be considered with caution.

DISCLAIMER

This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.

0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Your account will be affiliated with
and includes free access to OrthoEvidence


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

How to cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Prolonged use of Dalteparin for thromboprophylaxis not effective in reducing DVT incidence. OE Journal. 2013;1(11):130. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/prolonged-use-of-dalteparin-for-thromboprophylaxis-not-effective-in-reducing-dvt-incidence

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report