Peripheral nerve block anaesthesia and postoperative pain in acute ankle fracture surgery: the AnAnkle randomised trial
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2021;9(13):8 Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4): 881-888.¿Qué significa esto para mi consulta?
The results of this study suggest that a peripheral nerve blockade, via a popliteal sciatic nerve block and a saphenous nerve block, can significantly reduce post-operative pain and morphine consumption, as well as the incidence of opioid adverse events on post-operative day 2, compared to spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing acute ankle fracture surgery. The analgesic benefit appears to greater in older patients, and this should be explored in future studies. This study was limited by the lack of blinding and differences in initial post-operative care.
Resumen del estudio
One hundred and fifty patients scheduled for an acute ankle fracture surgery were randomized to receive peripheral nerve blockade (popliteal sciatic nerve block; saphenous nerve block; n=77) or spinal anesthesia (n=73). The primary outcome of interest was post-operative pain measured using the Pain Intensity and Opioid Consumption (PIOC) score, a composite of Numeric Pain Rating (NRS) area under the curve pain score and total morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes of interest included NRS area under the curve, morphine consumption, quality of recovery (QoR-15) score, opioid adverse events on the opioid related symptom distress score (OR-SDS), number of patients at risk of post-operative pain, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Outcomes were assessed up to 27 hours post-operation. Results revealed significantly lower PIOC scores, morphine consumption, and NRS area under curve pain scores in the peripheral nerve block group compared to the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.05 for all). Moreover, the incidence of opioid adverse events on post-operative day 2 and the number of patients at risk of post-operative pain were significantly lower in the peripheral nerve block group (p=0.001). No significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were observed between the two groups (p=0.075).
Desbloquear el informe ACE completo
Tiene acceso a 4 más artículos GRATUITOS este mes.
Haga clic a continuación para desbloquear y ver este ACE Reports
Desbloquear ahora
Evaluaciones críticas de los últimos ensayos controlados aleatorizados de gran impacto y revisiones sistemáticas en ortopedia
Acceso al contenido del podcast OrthoEvidence, que incluye colaboraciones con el Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas con cirujanos reconocidos internacionalmente y mesas redondas sobre noticias y temas ortopédicos
Suscripción a The Pulse, un boletín quincenal basado en la evidencia y diseñado para ayudarle a tomar mejores decisiones clínicas
Acceso exclusivo a artículos de contenido original, incluidas revisiones sistemáticas propias, y artículos sobre métodos de investigación sanitaria y temas ortopédicos de actualidad
O actualícese hoy mismo y obtenga acceso a todo el contenido de OrthoEvidencepor tan sólo 1,99 $ a la semana.
¿Ya tiene una cuenta? Conectarse
¿Está afiliado a una de nuestras asociaciones colaboradoras?
¡Haga clic aquí para obtener acceso gratuito como parte de los beneficios de miembro de su asociación!
Suscríbase a "El Pulso"
Ortopedia basada en la evidencia directamente a su bandeja de entrada. SUSCRIBIRSE