Peripheral Nerve Block vs. Spinal Anesthesia for Pain Control Post-Acute Ankle Fracture Surgery .
This study has been identified as potentially high impact.
OE's AI-driven High Impact metric estimates the influence a paper is likely to have by integrating signals from both the journal in which it is published and the scientific content of the article itself.
Developed using state-of-the-art natural language processing, the OE High Impact model more accurately predicts a study's future citation performance than journal impact factor alone.
This enables earlier recognition of clinically meaningful research and helps readers focus on articles most likely to shape future practice.
Peripheral nerve block anaesthesia and postoperative pain in acute ankle fracture surgery: the AnAnkle randomised trial
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4): 881-888.One hundred and fifty patients scheduled for an acute ankle fracture surgery were randomized to receive peripheral nerve blockade (popliteal sciatic nerve block; saphenous nerve block; n=77) or spinal anesthesia (n=73). The primary outcome of interest was post-operative pain measured using the Pain Intensity and Opioid Consumption (PIOC) score, a composite of Numeric Pain Rating (NRS) area under the curve pain score and total morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes of interest included NRS area under the curve, morphine consumption, quality of recovery (QoR-15) score, opioid adverse events on the opioid related symptom distress score (OR-SDS), number of patients at risk of post-operative pain, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. Outcomes were assessed up to 27 hours post-operation. Results revealed significantly lower PIOC scores, morphine consumption, and NRS area under curve pain scores in the peripheral nerve block group compared to the spinal anesthesia group (p<0.05 for all). Moreover, the incidence of opioid adverse events on post-operative day 2 and the number of patients at risk of post-operative pain were significantly lower in the peripheral nerve block group (p=0.001). No significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were observed between the two groups (p=0.075).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics