Meta-analysis: Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized in TKA .
Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Mar;28(3):439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.00812 papers (1114 patients (1265 knees)) were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis to compare posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses in TKA, assessing range of motion, flexion, and complication rates. Data demonstrated better flexion and range of motion in posterior-stabilized prosthesis, but no difference in complication rates. The clinical significance of the differences between these has yet to be identified.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
