ACE Report Cover
Lower pain with FN Block + SN Block versus FN Block + LIA following TKA
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Lingua
Download Download Download
Scaricare
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citare
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Preferiti
ARTHROPLASTY
Lower pain with FN Block + SN Block versus FN Block + LIA following TKA .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2016;4(8):5 BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec 15;15:182

34 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty and receiving continuous femoral nerve block were randomized to be administered a sciatic nerve block (SNB) or local infiltration analgesia (LIA) as part of the postoperative analgesia protocol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there were any significant differences in analgesic efficacy between the two protocols, as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores over the first 24 hours postoperatively. Results demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively in the SNB group compared to the LIA group, though the difference in pain score at 24 hours was not statistically significant.


Dettagli sul finanziamento della pubblicazione +
Finanziamento:
Non-funded
Conflitti:
Other

Rischio di pregiudizio

8/10

Criteri di segnalazione

19/20

Indice di fragilità

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sì = 1

Incerto = 0,5

Non rilevante = 0

No = 0

La valutazione dei criteri di segnalazione valuta la trasparenza con cui gli autori riportano le caratteristiche metodologiche e sperimentali dello studio all'interno della pubblicazione. La valutazione è suddivisa in cinque categorie che vengono presentate di seguito.

4/4

Aleatorización

3/4

Medición de resultados

4/4

Inclusión / exclusión

4/4

Descripción de la terapia

4/4

Estadísticas

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

L'Indice di Fragilità è uno strumento che aiuta l'interpretazione dei risultati significativi, fornendo una misura della forza di un risultato. L'Indice di Fragilità rappresenta il numero di eventi consecutivi che devono essere aggiunti a un risultato dicotomico per rendere il risultato non più significativo. Un numero piccolo rappresenta un risultato più debole, mentre un numero grande rappresenta un risultato più forte.

Perché questo studio era necessario ora?

Femoral nerve block is a peripheral nerve block that has been used for many years in surgical procedures of the lower limb, such as total knee arthroplasty. More recently, the administration of a sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block in these procedures has gained attention, along with controversy; there is particular concern regarding motor block, and the possible impact on early mobility and functional recovery, with combined blocks. With the development of local infiltration analgesia as a more recent method of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty, a comparison of analgesic efficacy between methods, as adjuvants to femoral nerve block, was needed.

Qual era la domanda di ricerca principale?

In patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with continuous femoral nerve block, is there any significant difference in pain scores up to 24 hours postoperatively between patients treated with a sciatic nerve block and patients treated with local infiltration analgesia?

Caratteristiche dello studio +
Population:
34 patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3. Diclofenac 25mg was administered if patients requested analgesics and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain exceeded 3. Pentazocine 15mg intramuscularly was used if diclofenac was unable to maintain pain <3 on the NRS.
Intervention:
LIA group: An ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block was administered with a bolus injection of 20mL 0.375% ropivacaine. Patients were also treated with a local anaesthetic solution containing 100mL 0.2% ropivacaine and 0.5mL (0.5mg) adrenaline; 20mL were injected intracutaneously at the beginning of the procedure; 50mL were used for injection into the vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, and lateral collateral ligament prior to cementing the prostheses; and 30mL were injected intraarticularly at the end of the procedure. Continuous FNB with 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h was started at the end of the procedure. (n=17, 16 completed; Mean age: 73 +/- 5.9; 3M/13F)
Comparison:
SNB group: Patients were treated with an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block with a bolus injection of 20mL 0.375% ropivacaine, after which an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block was administered with a bolus injection of 20mL 0.375% ropivacaine. Continuous FNB with 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h was started at the end of the procedure. (n=17, 17 completed; Mean age: 72 +/- 10; 2M/15F)
Outcomes:
Primary outcome measure was the NRS for pain. Additional outcomes included diclofenac consumption, knee range of motion for flexion and extension, patient satisfaction on a 5-point scale, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay.
Methods:
RCT; single-center, assessor-blind, parallel group
Time:
Assessment time points included when patients exited the operating room, and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed on the third postoperative day.
Quali erano i risultati importanti?
  • NRS pain scores were significantly lower in the SNB group when compared to the LIA group at 3 (0.06+/-0.24 vs. 2.13 +/- 2.66, respectively; p<0.01), 6 (0.18+/-0.39 vs. 2.5 +/- 2.34, respectively; p<0.01), and 12 (2+/-2.12 vs. 3.5+/-1.83, respectively; p=0.013) hours postoperatively
  • At 24 hours postoperatively, there was no significant difference in NRS pain score between the SNB group (2.47+/-1.59) and the LIA group (3+/-1.86) (p=0.3).
  • There was no significant difference between groups in time to first request of analgesic (p=0.59), or total dose of diclofenac administered (p=0.28). No patient required pentazocine.
  • Postoperative nausea or vomiting occurred in 4 patients of each group (p=0.92). Patient satisfaction on POD3 was similar between groups (p=0.75), and groups demonstrated similar hospital length of stay (p=0.69).
  • There were no significant differences between groups in range of motion (extension p=0.89 and flexion p=0.59) or Knee Society Score (p=0.86)
Che cosa devo ricordare di più?

Following total knee arthroplasty with continuous femoral nerve block, pain scores over the first 12 postoperative hours were significantly lower in patients who had been administered a sciatic nerve block when compared to patients who were administered local infiltration analgesia. Pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively were similar between groups. No significant differences between groups were noted in time to first analgesic request, or total dose of diclofenac received.

Come influenzerà l'assistenza ai miei pazienti?

The results of this study suggest that sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block may have greater analgesic efficacy compared to local infiltration analgesia in addition to femoral nerve block, with effects noted over the initial 12 hours after surgery. The authors acknowledge that the current protocol of local infiltration analgesia may not be the most optimal, and that additional randomized controlled trials should be considered to identify which local anaesthetic mixture and administration method offers the maximum analgesic efficacy. Additionally, no mention of motor weakness or falls was recorded, which can a concern with motor blockade as a result of peripheral nerve blocks in the setting of TKA.

DISCLAIMER

Il contenuto di questa pagina è solo a scopo informativo e non intende sostituire la consulenza, la diagnosi o il trattamento medico professionale. Se ha bisogno di cure mediche, si rivolga sempre al suo medico o al pronto soccorso più vicino. Le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista espressi dalle persone sui contenuti presenti in questa pagina non riflettono le opinioni, le convinzioni e i punti di vista di OrthoEvidence.

0 di 4 articoli mensili GRATUITI sbloccati
Ha raggiunto il suo limite di 4 visualizzazioni di articoli gratuiti questo mese

Accesso a OrthoEvidence a soli 1,99 dollari a settimana.

Rimanga in contatto con le ultime prove. Può disdire in qualsiasi momento.
  • Valutazioni critiche dei più recenti studi randomizzati controllati ad alto impatto e delle revisioni sistematiche in ortopedia.
  • Accesso ai contenuti del podcast OrthoEvidence, tra cui collaborazioni con il Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviste con chirurghi di fama internazionale e tavole rotonde su notizie e argomenti ortopedici.
  • Abbonamento a The Pulse, una newsletter bisettimanale basata sulle evidenze scientifiche, progettata per aiutarla a prendere decisioni cliniche migliori.
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bentornato!
Ha dimenticato la password?
Inizi la sua prova gratuita oggi stesso!

Il suo account sarà affiliato a
e includerà l'accesso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
Ha dimenticato la password?

O
Controlli la sua e-mail

Se esiste un account con l'indirizzo e-mail fornito, le verrà inviata un'e-mail di reimpostazione della password. Se non vede l'e-mail, controlli la cartella spam o posta indesiderata.

Per ulteriore assistenza, contatti il nostro team di supporto.

Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Tradurre il Rapporto ACE

OrthoEvidence utilizza un servizio di traduzione di terze parti per rendere i contenuti accessibili in più lingue. Si prega di notare che, sebbene venga fatto ogni sforzo per garantire l'accuratezza, le traduzioni potrebbero non essere sempre perfette.

Come citare questo documento ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Lower pain with FN Block + SN Block versus FN Block + LIA following TKA. OE Journal. 2016;4(8):5. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/lower-pain-with-fn-block-sn-block-versus-fn-block-lia-following-tka

Copiare la citazione
Effettui il login per abilitare questa funzione

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence attivo. Effettui il login o crei un account di prova GRATUITO.

Funzionalità per i membri Premium

Per accedere a questa funzione, deve essere collegato ad un account OrthoEvidence Premium.

Condividi questo articolo ACE Report