ACE Report Cover
Lower pain with FN Block + SN Block versus FN Block + LIA following TKA
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
اللغة
Download Download Download
تحميل
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
اقتباس
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ المفضلة
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
اللغة
Download Download Download
تحميل
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
اقتباس
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ المفضلة
ARTHROPLASTY
Lower pain with FN Block + SN Block versus FN Block + LIA following TKA .

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2016;4(8):5 BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Dec 15;15:182

34 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty and receiving continuous femoral nerve block were randomized to be administered a sciatic nerve block (SNB) or local infiltration analgesia (LIA) as part of the postoperative analgesia protocol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether there were any significant differences in analgesic efficacy between the two protocols, as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores over the first 24 hours postoperatively. Results demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively in the SNB group compared to the LIA group, though the difference in pain score at 24 hours was not statistically significant.


تفاصيل تمويل المنشور +
التمويل:
Non-funded
التعارضات:
Other

مخاطر التحيز

8/10

معايير الإبلاغ

19/20

مؤشر الهشاشة

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

نعم = 1

غير مؤكد = 0.5

غير ذي صلة = 0

لا = 0

يقيّم تقييم معايير الإبلاغ الشفافية التي يبلغ بها المؤلفون عن الخصائص المنهجية والتجريبية للتجربة في المنشور. ينقسم التقييم إلى خمس فئات معروضة أدناه.

4/4

Randomization

3/4

Outcome Measurements

4/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

4/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

مؤشر الهشاشة هو أداة تساعد في تفسير النتائج المهمة، وتوفر مقياسًا لقوة النتيجة. ويمثل مؤشر الهشاشة عدد الأحداث المتتالية التي يجب إضافتها إلى نتيجة ثنائية التفرع لجعل النتيجة غير مهمة. يمثل الرقم الصغير نتيجة أضعف ويمثل الرقم الكبير نتيجة أقوى.

لماذا كانت هناك حاجة لهذه الدراسة الآن؟

Femoral nerve block is a peripheral nerve block that has been used for many years in surgical procedures of the lower limb, such as total knee arthroplasty. More recently, the administration of a sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block in these procedures has gained attention, along with controversy; there is particular concern regarding motor block, and the possible impact on early mobility and functional recovery, with combined blocks. With the development of local infiltration analgesia as a more recent method of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty, a comparison of analgesic efficacy between methods, as adjuvants to femoral nerve block, was needed.

ما هو سؤال البحث الرئيسي؟

In patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with continuous femoral nerve block, is there any significant difference in pain scores up to 24 hours postoperatively between patients treated with a sciatic nerve block and patients treated with local infiltration analgesia?

خصائص الدراسة +
Population:
34 patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of 1-3. Diclofenac 25mg was administered if patients requested analgesics and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain exceeded 3. Pentazocine 15mg intramuscularly was used if diclofenac was unable to maintain pain <3 on the NRS.
Intervention:
LIA group: An ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block was administered with a bolus injection of 20mL 0.375% ropivacaine. Patients were also treated with a local anaesthetic solution containing 100mL 0.2% ropivacaine and 0.5mL (0.5mg) adrenaline; 20mL were injected intracutaneously at the beginning of the procedure; 50mL were used for injection into the vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, and lateral collateral ligament prior to cementing the prostheses; and 30mL were injected intraarticularly at the end of the procedure. Continuous FNB with 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h was started at the end of the procedure. (n=17, 16 completed; Mean age: 73 +/- 5.9; 3M/13F)
Comparison:
SNB group: Patients were treated with an ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block with a bolus injection of 20mL 0.375% ropivacaine, after which an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block was administered with a bolus injection of 20mL 0.375% ropivacaine. Continuous FNB with 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h was started at the end of the procedure. (n=17, 17 completed; Mean age: 72 +/- 10; 2M/15F)
Outcomes:
Primary outcome measure was the NRS for pain. Additional outcomes included diclofenac consumption, knee range of motion for flexion and extension, patient satisfaction on a 5-point scale, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and length of hospital stay.
Methods:
RCT; single-center, assessor-blind, parallel group
Time:
Assessment time points included when patients exited the operating room, and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed on the third postoperative day.
ما هي النتائج المهمة؟
  • NRS pain scores were significantly lower in the SNB group when compared to the LIA group at 3 (0.06+/-0.24 vs. 2.13 +/- 2.66, respectively; p<0.01), 6 (0.18+/-0.39 vs. 2.5 +/- 2.34, respectively; p<0.01), and 12 (2+/-2.12 vs. 3.5+/-1.83, respectively; p=0.013) hours postoperatively
  • At 24 hours postoperatively, there was no significant difference in NRS pain score between the SNB group (2.47+/-1.59) and the LIA group (3+/-1.86) (p=0.3).
  • There was no significant difference between groups in time to first request of analgesic (p=0.59), or total dose of diclofenac administered (p=0.28). No patient required pentazocine.
  • Postoperative nausea or vomiting occurred in 4 patients of each group (p=0.92). Patient satisfaction on POD3 was similar between groups (p=0.75), and groups demonstrated similar hospital length of stay (p=0.69).
  • There were no significant differences between groups in range of motion (extension p=0.89 and flexion p=0.59) or Knee Society Score (p=0.86)
ما الذي يجب أن أتذكره أكثر؟

Following total knee arthroplasty with continuous femoral nerve block, pain scores over the first 12 postoperative hours were significantly lower in patients who had been administered a sciatic nerve block when compared to patients who were administered local infiltration analgesia. Pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively were similar between groups. No significant differences between groups were noted in time to first analgesic request, or total dose of diclofenac received.

كيف سيؤثر ذلك على رعاية مرضاي؟

The results of this study suggest that sciatic nerve block in addition to femoral nerve block may have greater analgesic efficacy compared to local infiltration analgesia in addition to femoral nerve block, with effects noted over the initial 12 hours after surgery. The authors acknowledge that the current protocol of local infiltration analgesia may not be the most optimal, and that additional randomized controlled trials should be considered to identify which local anaesthetic mixture and administration method offers the maximum analgesic efficacy. Additionally, no mention of motor weakness or falls was recorded, which can a concern with motor blockade as a result of peripheral nerve blocks in the setting of TKA.

تنويه

هذا المحتوى الموجود في هذه الصفحة هو لأغراض إعلامية فقط وليس الغرض منه أن يكون بديلاً عن المشورة الطبية المتخصصة أو التشخيص أو العلاج. إذا كنت بحاجة إلى علاج طبي، اطلب دائمًا مشورة طبيبك أو اذهب إلى أقرب قسم طوارئ إليك. الآراء والمعتقدات ووجهات النظر التي يعبر عنها الأفراد في المحتوى الموجود في هذه الصفحة لا تعكس آراء ومعتقدات ووجهات نظر أورثوإيفيدنس.

0 من 4 مقالات مجانية شهرية غير مقفلة
لقد وصلت إلى الحد الأقصى لمشاهدة 4 من 4 مقالات مجانية هذا الشهر

ادخل إلى OrthoEvidence مقابل 1.99 دولارًا أمريكيًا في الأسبوع.

ابق على اتصال بأحدث الأدلة. قم بالإلغاء في أي وقت.
  • تقييمات نقدية لأحدث التجارب المعشاة ذات الشواهد عالية التأثير والمراجعات المنهجية في مجال جراحة العظام
  • الوصول إلى محتوى المدونة الصوتية OrthoEvidence، بما في ذلك التعاون مع مجلة جراحة العظام والمفاصل، والمقابلات مع الجراحين المعترف بهم دولياً، ومناقشات المائدة المستديرة حول أخبار وموضوعات جراحة العظام
  • الاشتراك في نشرة The Pulse، وهي نشرة إخبارية مبنية على الأدلة مرتين أسبوعيًا مصممة لمساعدتك على اتخاذ قرارات سريرية أفضل
Upgrade
Close Dialog
أهلاً بعودتك!
هل نسيت كلمة المرور؟
ابدأ تجربتك المجانية اليوم!

سيكون حسابك تابعًا لـ
ويتضمن وصولًا مجانيًا إلى OrthoEvidence


أو
هل نسيت كلمة المرور؟

أو
يرجى التحقق من بريدك الإلكتروني

في حالة وجود حساب بعنوان البريد الإلكتروني المقدم، سيتم إرسال بريد إلكتروني لإعادة تعيين كلمة المرور إليك. إذا كنت لا ترى بريدًا إلكترونيًا، يرجى التحقق من مجلد الرسائل غير المرغوب فيها أو البريد غير المرغوب فيه.

لمزيد من المساعدة اتصل بفريق الدعم لدينا.

يرجى تسجيل الدخول لتفعيل هذه الميزة

للوصول إلى هذه الميزة، يجب تسجيل الدخول إلى حساب OrthoEvidence نشط. يرجى تسجيل الدخول أو إنشاء حساب تجريبي مجاني.

ترجمة تقرير ACE

تستخدم OrthoEvidence خدمة ترجمة من طرف ثالث لإتاحة المحتوى بلغات متعددة. يُرجى ملاحظة أنه على الرغم من بذل كل جهد ممكن لضمان الدقة، إلا أن الترجمات قد لا تكون دائمًا مثالية.

كيفية الاستشهاد بهذا ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Lower pain with FN Block + SN Block versus FN Block + LIA following TKA. OE Journal. 2016;4(8):5. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/lower-pain-with-fn-block-sn-block-versus-fn-block-lia-following-tka

نسخ الاقتباس
يرجى تسجيل الدخول لتفعيل هذه الميزة

للوصول إلى هذه الميزة، يجب تسجيل الدخول إلى حساب OrthoEvidence نشط. يرجى تسجيل الدخول أو إنشاء حساب تجريبي مجاني.

ميزة العضو المميز

للوصول إلى هذه الميزة، يجب عليك تسجيل الدخول إلى حساب OrthoEvidence المميز.

شارك هذا ACE Report