ACE Report Cover
Local peroperative treatment of bisphosphonate improves knee prosthesis fixation
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Language
Download Download Download
Download
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Cite
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favorites
ARTHROPLASTY
Local peroperative treatment of bisphosphonate improves knee prosthesis fixation .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2013;1(11):96 Acta Orthop. 2007 Dec;78(6):795-9
Contributing Authors

M Hilding P Aspenberg

50 patients scheduled to receive a cemented knee prosthesis were randomized to receive either a localized treatment of ibandronate (a type of bisphosphonate) or a saline solution placebo during surgery. The primary outcome was maximal total point motion (MTPM) measured by radiostereometry (RSA). Results indicated that ibandronate appears to be a safe and viable treatment in reducing risk of prosthesis migration.


Publication Funding Details +
Funding:
Non-Industry funded
Sponsor:
Swedish Research Council and the strategic research program Materials in Medicine, Linkoping University, Sweden
Conflicts:
None disclosed

Risk of Bias

8.5/10

Reporting Criteria

17/20

Fragility Index

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Yes = 1

Uncertain = 0.5

Not Relevant = 0

No = 0

The Reporting Criteria Assessment evaluates the transparency with which authors report the methodological and trial characteristics of the trial within the publication. The assessment is divided into five categories which are presented below.

4/4

Randomization

4/4

Outcome Measurements

2/4

Inclusion / Exclusion

4/4

Therapy Description

3/4

Statistics

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

The Fragility Index is a tool that aids in the interpretation of significant findings, providing a measure of strength for a result. The Fragility Index represents the number of consecutive events that need to be added to a dichotomous outcome to make the finding no longer significant. A small number represents a weaker finding and a large number represents a stronger finding.

Why was this study needed now?

An optimal balance of bone resorption and formation is required for better early fixation in knee prostheses. Bisphosphonates impair bone resorption, leading to a more positive balance for early implant fixation. A previous study by the same authors have indicated the effectiveness of a bisphosphonate (an oral treatment of clodronate) in reducing migration rates of knee prostheses.This study examines the outcomes in total knee prosthesis fixation when ibandronate is locally administered peroperatively during surgery.

What was the principal research question?

What are the outcomes in maximal total point motion (MTPM) at 24 months when ibandronate is locally administered peroperatively in patients undergoing total knee prosthesis surgery?

Study Characteristics +
Population:
50 patients scheduled to receive a NexGen cemented knee prosthesis. (Age: 60-75 years)
Intervention:
Ibandronate group: Patients had Ibandronate 1 mg (1 mL) applied to the tibial surface 1 minute before cementation. (n=25)
Comparison:
Placebo group: Patients had 1 mL saline applied to tibial surface 1 minute before cementation. (n=25)
Outcomes:
Maximal total point motion (MTPM) measured by radiostereometry (RSA)
Methods:
RCT: Double-blind
Time:
24 months (Examination at postoperative day 1, and 6, 12, and 24 months)
What were the important findings?
  • The ibandronate group had reduced migration and had a reduction rate of 0.45 to 0.32 mm (95%CI for reduction: 0.04-0.21 mm) at 6 months. (p=0.006)
  • Migration along the y-axis was influenced significantly in patients who received Ibandoronate prior to surgery (p=0.009)
  • There was a reduction in migration from the postoperative examination of 0.47 to 0.36 mm (95% CI for reduction: 0.02-0.20 mm) at 12 months.
  • There was a reduction in migration from the postoperative examination of 0.47 to 0.40 mm (95%CI: -0.01-0.16 mm) at 24 months.
What should I remember most?

The locally administered ibandronate treatment appears to be a safe and effective treatment in reducing the risk of prosthesis migration during knee prosthesis fixation surgery.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

Patients may find improved stability and reduced migration when ibandronate is locally administered peroperatively during knee prosthesis fixation surgery. Further research on this study with a larger sample size is needed to verify the results presented in this study.

DISCLAIMER

This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.

0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Your account will be affiliated with
and includes free access to OrthoEvidence


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

How to cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Local peroperative treatment of bisphosphonate improves knee prosthesis fixation. OE Journal. 2013;1(11):96. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/local-peroperative-treatment-of-bisphosphonate-improves-knee-prosthesis-fixation

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report