Intramedullary Nail Vs Plate Fixation for Supination External Rotation Type IV Ankle Injuries .
Comparative Analysis of Intramedullary Nail versus Plate Fixation for Fibula Fracture in Supination External Rotation Type IV Ankle Injury.
Med Sci Monit . 2024 Feb 2:30:e941909.Eighty-one patients with supination external rotation type IV ankle injuries were randomized to receive either intramedullary nail fixation (n=42) or plate fixation (n=39). Outcomes of interest included the rate of postoperative complications, operation times, bone healing times, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, and ankle range of motion. Outcomes were assessed up to 12 months. Overall, the results of the study revealed that the intramedullary nail group had a significantly lower rate of postoperative complications compared to the plate fixation group. Both treatments had similar results in terms of operation time, bone healing time, AOFAS scores, VAS scores, and functional evaluations. The findings suggest that intramedullary nail fixation may be preferable due to its lower complication rate.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics