Comparing Erector Spinae Plane & Caudal Epidural Block for Pain Relief after Lumbar Fusion Surgery .
Comparison Between Relative Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Caudal Epidural Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Fusion Surgery- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
Global Spine J . 2025 Mar;15(2):639-647.Eighty-one patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion surgery were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB, n=27), caudal epidural block (CEB, n=27), or no block (control, n=27). The primary outcome was total opioid consumption (TOC) in the first 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), time to mobilization, patient satisfaction score, length of hospital stay, and complications. Outcomes were assessed up to 72 hours post-surgery. Overall, the results of the study revealed that both block groups had significantly lower TOC, pain scores, and shorter hospital stays compared to the control group. The ESPB group had longer-lasting analgesia, shorter surgical times, and less blood loss than the CEB group. These findings suggest that both ESPB and CEB can be considered effective strategies in multimodal analgesia, with ESPB showing superior duration of analgesia.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics