COA 2024: Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of RCTs .
Clinical, Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Eight studies with 722 hip osteoarthritis patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic-assisted THA versus conventional THA. Pooled outcomes of interest included rates of major complications, revision, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as pain, walking, and daily function, and radiological accuracy. The analysis found no significant difference between robotic-assisted THA and conventional THA in terms of major complications, revision rates, and PROMs, although robotic-assisted THA did show a lower leg length discrepancy. The main findings suggest that robotic-assisted THA does not provide clinically meaningful improvements over conventional THA in the evaluated outcomes.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
