ACE Report Cover
An intra-articular injection of LMW human serum albumin is safe and effective for knee OA
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Langue
Download Download Download
Télécharger
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citer
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoris
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Langue
Download Download Download
Télécharger
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citer
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoris

OSTEOARTHRITIS

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate two doses of an intra-articular injection of LMWF-5A in adults with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2014;2(11):18 PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087910. eCollection 2014.

329 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to receive either Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) or saline vehicle solution, each at a dose of either 4 or 10 mL. The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of LMWF-5A in this study population. Results indicated that both the 4-mL and 10-mL volumes of the LMWF-5A solution were safe and yielded significantly better pain scores, functional outcome, and overall assessment of disease severity, when compared to a saline vehicle solution. These effects were especially pronounced in patients with severe OA, and those who received a prior knee injection.


Détails du financement de la publication +
Financement:
Industry funded
Sponsor:
Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conflits:
Company Employee

Risque de partialité

8/10

Critères de déclaration

19/20

Indice de fragilité

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Oui = 1

Incertain = 0,5

Non pertinent = 0

Non = 0

L'évaluation des critères de rapport permet d'évaluer la transparence avec laquelle les auteurs rapportent les caractéristiques méthodologiques et les caractéristiques de l'essai dans la publication. L'évaluation est divisée en cinq catégories qui sont présentées ci-dessous.

4/4

التوزيع العشوائي

3/4

قياسات النتائج

4/4

الشمول / الاستبعاد

4/4

وصف العلاج

4/4

الإحصاء

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

L'indice de fragilité est un outil qui aide à l'interprétation des résultats significatifs, en fournissant une mesure de la force d'un résultat. L'indice de fragilité représente le nombre d'événements consécutifs qui doivent être ajoutés à un résultat dichotomique pour que le résultat ne soit plus significatif. Un petit nombre représente un résultat plus faible et un grand nombre un résultat plus fort.

Pourquoi cette étude était-elle nécessaire maintenant ?

The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is on the rise. This increase - potentially attributable (in part) to the increasing rates of obesity within the population - in concerning, as knee OA can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Currently, conservative treatment for this inflammatory condition may include intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronan injections, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); however, these approaches are not supported by high-quality evidence. As a result, human serum albumin (HSA) has been proposed as an alternative in the management of knee OA. This study was needed to establish the analgesic efficacy and safety of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% HSA (LMWF-5A) for the treatment of patients with knee OA.

Quelle était la principale question de recherche ?

Is the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) safe and effective for improving pain, stiffness, function and overall disease severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Caractéristiques de l'étude +
Population:
329 fully ambulatory patients (40-85 years of age) with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) radiologically confirmed within 6 months of screening. Included patients had moderate-severe pain in the affected knee. If patients presented with bilateral knee OA, then the knee that best satisfied treatment requirements was chosen for the study.
Intervention:
4 mL LMWF-5A group: Patients in this group (n=83; 3 discontinued by week 12) received a single, 4-mL intra-articular injection of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A). The HSA used in this study (OctaPharma, Lachen, Switzerland) was centrifuged and subject to ultrafiltration. The ultrafiltrate contained aspartyl-alanyl diketopiperazine (50-200 uM), as well as the excipients (sodium caprylate and sodium acetyltryptophanate), and was transferred for aseptic filling. (Mean age: 62.7 [SD 9.3]; 67% female) 10 mL LMWF-5A group: Patients in this group (n=82; 1 discontinued by week 12) received a single, 10-mL intra-articular injection of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A). The HSA used in this study (OctaPharma, Lachen, Switzerland) was centrifuged and subject to ultrafiltration. The ultrafiltrate contained aspartyl-alanyl diketopiperazine (50-200 uM), as well as the excipients (sodium caprylate and sodium acetyltryptophanate), and was transferred for aseptic filling. (Mean age: 62.8 [SD 8.4]; 56% female)
Comparaison:
4 mL saline vehicle control group: Patients in this group (n=83) received a single, 4-mL, intra-articular injection of a saline vehicle. (Mean age: 60.7 [SD 8.3]; 69% female) 10 mL saline vehicle control group: Patients in this group (n=81; 2 discontinued by week 12) received a single, 10-mL, intra-articular injection of a saline vehicle. (Mean age: 63.8 [SD 10.0]; 62% female)
Résultats:
The primary outcome was pain on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain subscale (measured on a 5-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of adverse events, stiffness (assessed on the WOMAC stiffness subscale), physical function (assessed on the WOMAC function subscale), pain at rest and with movement, Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease severity, and use of rescue analgesia (acetaminophen).
Méthodes:
RCT; Multi-Centre (9 sites); Double-blinded (patients & assessors)
Durée de l'intervention:
Follow-up assessments were conducted by telephone at 2, 4, 8, and 10 weeks and in-clinic assessments took place at 6 and 12 weeks.

Quels sont les résultats importants ?

  • In general, LMWF-5A improved pain significantly more (-0.93) compared to the control solution (-0.72) (estimated difference: -0.25; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.41; p=0.004). This significant between-group difference was apparent at week 4 (p=0.03), week 6 (p=0.04) and week 12 (p=0.004), but not at weeks 2 (p=0.14), 8 (p=0.06) or 10 (p=0.11).
  • Over time ending at week 12, the percentage of pain score reduction was significantly greater when patients were administered LMWF-5A (42.3%) compared to the control solution (31.7%) (p<0.05).
  • Compared to patients receiving the saline vehicle solution, those receiving LMWF-5A had significantly superior Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease severity scores (-0.87 vs -0.65; p=0.01), physical function (-0.78 vs -0.64; p=0.04) and pain at rest (-0.91 vs -0.70; p=0.004).
  • Whether patients were administered LMWF-5A or the saline vehicle solution, there was no significant difference in the number of acetaminophen pills consumed (median 24.0 vs 34.0; p=0.09), or stiffness (p>0.05).
  • In patients with severe OA, LMWF-5A had a significant pain improvement compared to the saline solution (-0.42; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.77; p=0.02). Furthermore, patients who had previously received a knee injection had a significantly better mean pain outcome with LMWF-5A compared to control, whereas this finding was borderline-significant in patients who did not receive a previous injection.
  • Between the LMWF-5A and control in injection groups, there were no significant differences in total adverse events (41% vs 47%), treatment-related adverse events (10% vs 13%), or serious adverse events (5% vs 6%). No serious adverse event was considered to be study-related and no deaths occurred.
De quoi dois-je me souvenir en priorité ?

In patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), both the 4-mL and 10-mL volumes of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) were safe and yielded significantly better pain scores, functional outcome, and overall assessment of disease severity, when compared to a saline vehicle solution. These effects were especially pronounced in patients with severe OA, and those who had received a prior knee injection. Stiffness and the amount of rescue analgesics consumed were not significantly different between groups.

Comment cela affectera-t-il les soins prodigués à mes patients ?

Results from this study support the administration of a single, intra-articular injection of Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This finding is promising in patients with severe OA, for whom the only other treatment alternative may be surgical intervention. Additional long-term studies, with larger sample sizes, are needed to confirm these results.

AVIS DE NON-RESPONSABILITÉ

Le contenu de cette page est fourni à titre d'information uniquement et n'est pas destiné à remplacer un avis médical, un diagnostic ou un traitement professionnel. Si vous avez besoin d'un traitement médical, demandez toujours l'avis de votre médecin ou rendez-vous au service des urgences le plus proche. Les opinions, croyances et points de vue exprimés par les individus sur le contenu de cette page ne reflètent pas les opinions, croyances et points de vue d'OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 articles mensuels GRATUITS débloqués
Vous avez atteint votre limite de 4 vues d'articles gratuits ce mois-ci

Accédez à OrthoEvidence pour seulement 1,99 $ par semaine.

Restez informé des dernières données. Annulez à tout moment.
  • Évaluations critiques des derniers essais contrôlés randomisés à fort impact et des revues systématiques en orthopédie.
  • Accès au contenu des podcasts OrthoEvidence, y compris les collaborations avec le Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, les entretiens avec des chirurgiens de renommée internationale et les tables rondes sur l'actualité et les sujets orthopédiques.
  • Abonnement à The Pulse, une lettre d'information bihebdomadaire fondée sur des données probantes, conçue pour vous aider à prendre de meilleures décisions cliniques.
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bienvenue à nouveau !
Vous avez oublié votre mot de passe ?
Commencez votre essai GRATUIT dès aujourd'hui !

Votre compte sera affilié à
et inclut un accès gratuit à OrthoEvidence.


OU
Vous avez oublié votre mot de passe ?

OU
Veuillez vérifier votre adresse électronique

Si un compte existe avec l'adresse e-mail fournie, un e-mail de réinitialisation du mot de passe vous sera envoyé. Si vous ne voyez pas d'e-mail, veuillez vérifier votre dossier de spam ou de courrier indésirable.

Pour plus d'assistance, contactez notre équipe d'assistance.

Veuillez vous connecter pour activer cette fonction

Pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité, vous devez être connecté à un compte OrthoEvidence actif. Veuillez vous connecter ou créer un compte d'essai GRATUIT.

Traduire le rapport ACE

OrthoEvidence utilise un service de traduction tiers pour rendre le contenu accessible dans plusieurs langues. Veuillez noter que même si tous les efforts sont faits pour assurer l'exactitude, les traductions ne sont pas toujours parfaites.

Comment citer ce document ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. An intra-articular injection of LMW human serum albumin is safe and effective for knee OA. OE Journal. 2014;2(11):18. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/an-intra-articular-injection-of-lmw-human-serum-albumin-is-safe-and-effective-for-knee-oa

Copier la citation
Veuillez vous connecter pour activer cette fonction

Pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité, vous devez être connecté à un compte OrthoEvidence actif. Veuillez vous connecter ou créer un compte d'essai GRATUIT.

Fonctionnalité Membre Premium

Pour accéder à cette fonctionnalité, vous devez être connecté à un compte Premium OrthoEvidence.

Partager ACE Report