ACE Report Cover
An intra-articular injection of LMW human serum albumin is safe and effective for knee OA
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descargar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos
Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report Translate this  ACE Report
Idioma
Download Download Download
Descargar
Cite this Report Cite this Report Cite this Report
Citar
Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Add to Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites Remove from Favorites
+ Favoritos

OSTEOARTHRITIS

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate two doses of an intra-articular injection of LMWF-5A in adults with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report

OE Journal. 2014;2(11):18 PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087910. eCollection 2014.

329 patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) were randomized to receive either Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) or saline vehicle solution, each at a dose of either 4 or 10 mL. The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of LMWF-5A in this study population. Results indicated that both the 4-mL and 10-mL volumes of the LMWF-5A solution were safe and yielded significantly better pain scores, functional outcome, and overall assessment of disease severity, when compared to a saline vehicle solution. These effects were especially pronounced in patients with severe OA, and those who received a prior knee injection.


Detalles de la financiación de la publicación +
Financiación:
Industry funded
Patrocinador:
Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conflictos:
Company Employee

Riesgo de sesgo

8/10

Criterios de información

19/20

Índice de fragilidad

N/A

Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?

Was allocation adequately concealed?

Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?

Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?

Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?

Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?

Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?

Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?

Sí = 1

Incierto = 0,5

No relevante = 0

No = 0

La evaluación de los criterios de información evalúa la transparencia con la que los autores informan de las características metodológicas y del ensayo dentro de la publicación. La evaluación se divide en cinco categorías que se presentan a continuación.

4/4

التوزيع العشوائي

3/4

قياسات النتائج

4/4

الشمول / الاستبعاد

4/4

وصف العلاج

4/4

الإحصاء

Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65

El Índice de Fragilidad es una herramienta que ayuda en la interpretación de hallazgos significativos, proporcionando una medida de fuerza para un resultado. El Índice de Fragilidad representa el número de eventos consecutivos que es necesario añadir a un resultado dicotómico para que el hallazgo deje de ser significativo. Un número pequeño representa un hallazgo más débil y un número grande un hallazgo más fuerte.

¿Por qué se necesitaba ahora este estudio?

The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is on the rise. This increase - potentially attributable (in part) to the increasing rates of obesity within the population - in concerning, as knee OA can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Currently, conservative treatment for this inflammatory condition may include intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronan injections, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); however, these approaches are not supported by high-quality evidence. As a result, human serum albumin (HSA) has been proposed as an alternative in the management of knee OA. This study was needed to establish the analgesic efficacy and safety of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% HSA (LMWF-5A) for the treatment of patients with knee OA.

¿Cuál era la pregunta principal de la investigación?

Is the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) safe and effective for improving pain, stiffness, function and overall disease severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis?

Características del estudio +
Población:
329 fully ambulatory patients (40-85 years of age) with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) radiologically confirmed within 6 months of screening. Included patients had moderate-severe pain in the affected knee. If patients presented with bilateral knee OA, then the knee that best satisfied treatment requirements was chosen for the study.
Intervención:
4 mL LMWF-5A group: Patients in this group (n=83; 3 discontinued by week 12) received a single, 4-mL intra-articular injection of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A). The HSA used in this study (OctaPharma, Lachen, Switzerland) was centrifuged and subject to ultrafiltration. The ultrafiltrate contained aspartyl-alanyl diketopiperazine (50-200 uM), as well as the excipients (sodium caprylate and sodium acetyltryptophanate), and was transferred for aseptic filling. (Mean age: 62.7 [SD 9.3]; 67% female) 10 mL LMWF-5A group: Patients in this group (n=82; 1 discontinued by week 12) received a single, 10-mL intra-articular injection of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A). The HSA used in this study (OctaPharma, Lachen, Switzerland) was centrifuged and subject to ultrafiltration. The ultrafiltrate contained aspartyl-alanyl diketopiperazine (50-200 uM), as well as the excipients (sodium caprylate and sodium acetyltryptophanate), and was transferred for aseptic filling. (Mean age: 62.8 [SD 8.4]; 56% female)
Comparación:
4 mL saline vehicle control group: Patients in this group (n=83) received a single, 4-mL, intra-articular injection of a saline vehicle. (Mean age: 60.7 [SD 8.3]; 69% female) 10 mL saline vehicle control group: Patients in this group (n=81; 2 discontinued by week 12) received a single, 10-mL, intra-articular injection of a saline vehicle. (Mean age: 63.8 [SD 10.0]; 62% female)
Resultados:
The primary outcome was pain on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) pain subscale (measured on a 5-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of adverse events, stiffness (assessed on the WOMAC stiffness subscale), physical function (assessed on the WOMAC function subscale), pain at rest and with movement, Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease severity, and use of rescue analgesia (acetaminophen).
Métodos:
RCT; Multi-Centre (9 sites); Double-blinded (patients & assessors)
Tiempo:
Follow-up assessments were conducted by telephone at 2, 4, 8, and 10 weeks and in-clinic assessments took place at 6 and 12 weeks.

¿Cuáles fueron los hallazgos importantes?

  • In general, LMWF-5A improved pain significantly more (-0.93) compared to the control solution (-0.72) (estimated difference: -0.25; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.41; p=0.004). This significant between-group difference was apparent at week 4 (p=0.03), week 6 (p=0.04) and week 12 (p=0.004), but not at weeks 2 (p=0.14), 8 (p=0.06) or 10 (p=0.11).
  • Over time ending at week 12, the percentage of pain score reduction was significantly greater when patients were administered LMWF-5A (42.3%) compared to the control solution (31.7%) (p<0.05).
  • Compared to patients receiving the saline vehicle solution, those receiving LMWF-5A had significantly superior Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of disease severity scores (-0.87 vs -0.65; p=0.01), physical function (-0.78 vs -0.64; p=0.04) and pain at rest (-0.91 vs -0.70; p=0.004).
  • Whether patients were administered LMWF-5A or the saline vehicle solution, there was no significant difference in the number of acetaminophen pills consumed (median 24.0 vs 34.0; p=0.09), or stiffness (p>0.05).
  • In patients with severe OA, LMWF-5A had a significant pain improvement compared to the saline solution (-0.42; 95% CI -0.08 to -0.77; p=0.02). Furthermore, patients who had previously received a knee injection had a significantly better mean pain outcome with LMWF-5A compared to control, whereas this finding was borderline-significant in patients who did not receive a previous injection.
  • Between the LMWF-5A and control in injection groups, there were no significant differences in total adverse events (41% vs 47%), treatment-related adverse events (10% vs 13%), or serious adverse events (5% vs 6%). No serious adverse event was considered to be study-related and no deaths occurred.
¿Qué es lo que más debo recordar?

In patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), both the 4-mL and 10-mL volumes of the Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) were safe and yielded significantly better pain scores, functional outcome, and overall assessment of disease severity, when compared to a saline vehicle solution. These effects were especially pronounced in patients with severe OA, and those who had received a prior knee injection. Stiffness and the amount of rescue analgesics consumed were not significantly different between groups.

¿Cómo afectará esto al cuidado de mis pacientes?

Results from this study support the administration of a single, intra-articular injection of Low Molecular Weight Fraction of 5% human serum albumin (LMWF-5A) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). This finding is promising in patients with severe OA, for whom the only other treatment alternative may be surgical intervention. Additional long-term studies, with larger sample sizes, are needed to confirm these results.

DESCARGO DE RESPONSABILIDAD

El contenido de esta página tiene únicamente fines informativos y no pretende sustituir el consejo, diagnóstico o tratamiento médico profesional. Si necesita tratamiento médico, busque siempre el consejo de su médico o acuda al servicio de urgencias más cercano. Las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista expresados por las personas sobre el contenido que se encuentra en esta página no reflejan las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista de OrthoEvidence.

0 de 4 artículos mensuales GRATIS desbloqueados
Ha alcanzado su límite de vistas de 4 artículos gratuitos este mes

Acceda a OrtoEvidencia por tan sólo 1,99 $ a la semana.

Manténgase conectado con las últimas pruebas. Cancele en cualquier momento.
  • Valoraciones críticas de los últimos ensayos controlados aleatorizados de gran impacto y revisiones sistemáticas en ortopedia
  • Acceso al contenido del podcast OrthoEvidence, que incluye colaboraciones con el Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, entrevistas con cirujanos reconocidos internacionalmente y mesas redondas sobre noticias y temas ortopédicos
  • Suscripción a The Pulse, un boletín quincenal basado en la evidencia y diseñado para ayudarle a tomar mejores decisiones clínicas
Upgrade
Close Dialog
Bienvenido
¿Ha olvidado su contraseña?
Comience hoy mismo su prueba GRATUITA

Su cuenta estará afiliada a
e incluye acceso gratuito a OrthoEvidence


O
¿Olvidó su contraseña?

O
Compruebe su correo electrónico

Si existe una cuenta con la dirección de correo electrónico proporcionada, se le enviará un correo electrónico para restablecer la contraseña. Si no ve el correo electrónico, compruebe su carpeta de correo no deseado o spam.

Si necesita más ayuda póngase en contacto con nuestro equipo de asistencia.

Inicie sesión para activar esta función

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta activa de OrthoEvidence. Por favor, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta de prueba GRATUITA.

Traducir Informe ACE

OrthoEvidence utiliza un servicio de traducción de terceros para que el contenido sea accesible en varios idiomas. Tenga en cuenta que, aunque se hace todo lo posible para garantizar la exactitud, las traducciones no siempre son perfectas.

Cómo citar esto ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. An intra-articular injection of LMW human serum albumin is safe and effective for knee OA. OE Journal. 2014;2(11):18. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/an-intra-articular-injection-of-lmw-human-serum-albumin-is-safe-and-effective-for-knee-oa

Copiar cita
Inicie sesión para activar esta función

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta activa de OrthoEvidence. Por favor, inicie sesión o cree una cuenta de prueba GRATUITA.

Función de miembro Premium

Para acceder a esta función, debe iniciar sesión en una cuenta Premium de OrthoEvidence.

Compartir ACE Report