Surgical treatment of scaphoid waist fractures associated with high risk of complications .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Este estudio ha sido identificado como potencialmente de alto impacto.
La métrica de alto impacto de OE, impulsada por la IA, estima la influencia que probablemente tendrá un artículo integrando señales tanto de la revista en la que se publica como del contenido científico del propio artículo.
Desarrollado mediante el procesamiento del lenguaje natural más avanzado, el modelo de Alto Impacto de OE predice con mayor precisión el futuro rendimiento de las citas de un estudio que el factor de impacto de la revista por sí solo.
Esto permite reconocer antes las investigaciones clínicamente significativas y ayuda a los lectores a centrarse en los artículos con más probabilidades de configurar la práctica futura.
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2013;1(17):4 J Hand Surg Am. 2011 Nov;36(11):1759-1768.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.08.0336 studies (363 patients) examining outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatments of undisplaced or minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures were evaluated through pairwise meta-analysis. An additional 3 trials were also identified for inclusion in a network meta-analysis. Following assessments of fracture union, complications, range of motion, grip strength, and osteoarthritis between patients who underwent either surgical or non-surgical treatment, there was a non-significant trend to increased union with surgical treatment. However this method of treatment was also associated with a higher risk of complications.
Were the search methods used to find evidence (original research) on the primary question or questions stated?
Was the search for evidence reasonably comprehensive?
Were the criteria used for deciding which studies to include in the overview reported?
Was the bias in the selection of studies avoided?
Were the criteria used for assessing the validity of the included studies reported?
Was the validity of all of the studies referred to in the text assessed with use of appropriate criteria (either in selecting the studies for inclusion or in analyzing the studies that were cited)?
Were the methods used to combine the findings of the relevant studies (to reach a conclusion) reported?
Were the findings of the relevant studies combined appropriately relative to the primary question that the overview addresses?
Were the conclusions made by the author or authors supported by the data and or analysis reported in the overview?
How would you rate the scientific quality of this evidence?
Sí = 1
Incierto = 0,5
No relevante = 0
No = 0
La evaluación de los criterios de información evalúa la transparencia con la que los autores informan de las características metodológicas y del ensayo dentro de la publicación. La evaluación se divide en cinco categorías que se presentan a continuación.
4/4
Introduction
3/4
Accessing Data
4/4
Analysing Data
3/4
Results
3/4
Discussion
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
El Índice de Fragilidad es una herramienta que ayuda en la interpretación de hallazgos significativos, proporcionando una medida de fuerza para un resultado. El Índice de Fragilidad representa el número de eventos consecutivos que es necesario añadir a un resultado dicotómico para que el hallazgo deje de ser significativo. Un número pequeño representa un hallazgo más débil y un número grande un hallazgo más fuerte.
¿Por qué se necesitaba ahora este estudio?
When scaphoid waist fractures occur they should be immobilized in order to allow for anatomical union and to prevent midcarpal arthrosis and carpal malalignment. Treatment can occur either surgically or non-surgically using a cast, but it is still unknown which method is the most effective. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the odds ratio of fracture union, complications, and other clinical outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of scaphoid waist fractures.
¿Cuál era la pregunta principal de la investigación?
Was surgical treatment of scaphoid waist fractures more effective than nonsurgical treatments, in terms of the odds ratio of fracture union?
- In the Pairwise meta-analysis there were 6 studies included (7 publications) that compared non –operative and operative treatment of scaphoid waist fractures. The Network meta-analysis identified another 3 randomized controlled trials that compared 2 non-surgical treatments resulting in a total of 9 trials comparing 5 different treatment methods.
- The Pairwise meta-analysis resulted in an overall pooled odds ratio of fracture union rate that was 2.36 (95% CI: 0.02, 8.9; p=0.210; I-squared: 0%). Although, the pooled odds ratio of fracture union rate was higher in the nonsurgical treatment patients (ratio: 3.10; 95% CI: 0.46, 21.05; p=0.250; I-squared: 0%) than in the surgical patients (ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.11, 20.57; p=0.780; I-squared: 46.1%), this was not significant.
- The Pairwise meta-analysis of complication rate had a pooled odds ratio of 6.96 (95% CI: 2.13, 27.73; p=0.001; I-squared: 0%), which indicated an elevated risk of complication for those undergoing surgical treatment.
- Although the mean overall percentage difference in the range of motion (2.1%; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.08; p=0.430; I-squared: 61.4%) and grip strength (2.6%; 95% CI: -0.013, 0.066; p=0.190; I-squared: 0%) between the surgical and nonsurgical groups in the Pairwise Meta-analysis favoured surgery, these variations were not significant.
- The pooled odds ratios for osteoarthritis of the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint (3.25; 95% CI: 0.073, 14.39; p=0.120; I-squared: 65.4%) between the surgical and nonsurgical groups favoured surgery, while the pooled odds ratios for osteoarthritis of the radiocarpal joint (0.75; 95% CI: 0.15, 3.82; p=0.730; I-squared: 67.2%) between the surgical and nonsurgical groups favoured nonsurgery, these differences were not statistically significant.
- The Network meta-analysis assessed the odds ratio of fracture union for all possible pairwise comparisons. The results indicated that long and short thumb spica casts had the highest probability of being the best treatment (0.810). This was influenced by the lower number of non-unions in the solitary trial that compared these treatments.
¿Qué es lo que más debo recordar?
Although the pair-wise analysis indicated a higher fraction union rate for the surgical treatment, this difference was not significant. Furthermore, surgical treatment appeared to have a higher risk of developing complications.
¿Cómo afectará esto al cuidado de mis pacientes?
Patients should be aware that there is a risk of developing complications by undergoing surgical treatment for scaphoid waist fractures. Although fracture union rates appeared to be higher with surgery in this study, this difference was not significant and there is no clear evidence indicating a significant increased union rates with surgery. Unless new evidence is released, then patients should continue to be treated using nonsurgical treatments.
DESCARGO DE RESPONSABILIDAD
El contenido de esta página tiene únicamente fines informativos y no pretende sustituir el consejo, diagnóstico o tratamiento médico profesional. Si necesita tratamiento médico, busque siempre el consejo de su médico o acuda al servicio de urgencias más cercano. Las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista expresados por las personas sobre el contenido que se encuentra en esta página no reflejan las opiniones, creencias y puntos de vista de OrthoEvidence.
0 de 4 artículos mensuales GRATIS desbloqueados
