Try Ask OE! Our NEW Advanced AI Enabled Search
Dive into the Largest Database of
Musculoskeletal Evidence
Cemented versus uncemented femoral stem fixation in hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Injury. 2026 07-Sep;():. 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113428
Properly designed femoral stem impactors help to avoid overstuffing and make a second trial reduction unnecessary.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2026 01-Mar;():. 10.1007/s00402-026-06242-2
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of the Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Results of an Ultra-Short vs a Conventional Length Cementless Anatomic Femoral Stem
J Arthroplasty. 2021 01-May;():. 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.030
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Stems in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 01-Mar;():. 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.071
Is Posterior Femoral Neck Cortex an Obstacle in Achieving Sagittal Plane Balance of Uncemented Straight Femoral Stem?
Indian J Orthop. 2023 01-Aug;():. 10.1007/s43465-023-00958-8
2-Year Radiostereometric Analysis Evaluation of a Short, Proximally Coated, Triple-Taper Blade Femoral Stem Versus a Quadrangular-Taper Stem With Reinforced Proximal Body: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Arthroplasty. 2023 01-Jul;():. 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.030
Effectiveness of a patient-specific guide for femoral stem implantation in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized control trial.
Int Orthop. 2022 01-Apr;():. 10.1007/s00264-021-05287-9
Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 17-May;():. 10.1186/s13018-021-02465-8
Impact of Implant Design on Femoral Stem Migration Following Direct Anterior and Direct Lateral Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
COA_2021_7
Periprosthetic fracture around a stable femoral stem treated with locking plate osteosynthesis: distal femoral locking plate alone versus with cerclage cable
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 01-Jul;():. 10.1007/s00590-017-1900-5
Comparative Analysis between Short Stem and Conventional Femoral Stem in Patients with Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head: Metha Stem and Excia Stem
Orthop Surg. 2020 01-Jun;():. 10.1111/os.12684
Determining the Impact Hip Femoral Stem Design Has on Subsidence and Patient Activity for Patients Undergoing Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
Primary stability of a short bone-conserving femoral stem
Bone Joint J. 2018 Sep;100-B(9):1148-1156. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2017-1403.R1
Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2008-17
No medium-term advantage of electrochemical deposition of hydroxyapatite in cementless femoral stems
Acta Orthop. 2016 Feb;87(1):42-7.
A randomised trial comparing a short and a standard-length metaphyseal engaging cementless femoral stem using radiostereometric analysis
Bone Joint J. 2015 May;97-B(5):595-602.
The effect of a collar and surface finish on cemented femoral stems: a prospective randomised trial of four stem designs
Int Orthop. 2014 Jun;38(6):1131-7
Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs. A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
Acta Orthop. 2014 Apr;85(2):152-8
A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):774-81
Comparison of two hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: clinical, functional, and bone densitometry evaluation of patients randomized to a regular or modified hydroxyapatite-coated stem aimed at proximal fixation.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Apr;21(3):344-52
Showing 1-20 of 28 results