Either intravenous or local steroid effective versus control to mitigate dysphagia after ACDF

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1461-1472. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01540

Similar fusion success rate between i-Factor allograft and local autograft in single-level ACDF

Neurosurgery. 2018 Sep 1;83(3):377-384. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx432

Total disc replacement improves outcomes compared to ACDF for degenerative cervical disc disease

Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):991-1001. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0120.R1

No effect on dysphagia of local DepoMedrol versus saline in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):10-17

Similar overall complication rate between endoscopic & microendoscopic foraminotomy

World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:217-227

Fusion rate of PEEK cage with or without β-tricalcium phosphate bone substitute in ACDF

Eur Spine J. 2018 Jun;27(6):1358-1364

Rate and reoperation of adjacent segment degeneration lower with CDA versus ACDF in spine surgery

World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:225-231

AAOS2018: Local steroid does not significantly affect dysphagia following 1- to 3-level ACDF

Additional mobilization to PT further improves pain and function versus PT alone for neck pain

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jan;22(1):24-31

Comparing 2-year efficacy of CDA versus ACDF in management of two-level cervical spine degeneration

J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):7-19

AAOS2017: Cervical bracing after ACDF does not improve fusion rate or clinical outcome

AAOS2017: Local steroid following ACDF lowers incidence of dysphagia postoperatively

Similar fusion rate and clinical outcome in ACDF completed with PEEK vs titanium cage

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 1;17:379

Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy versus physiotherapy in chronic nonspecific neck pain

Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2087-96.

Mid-term efficacy & safety of CDA vs ACDF for 1-level cervical disc spondylosis

Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):829-33

Efficacy of geriatric interdisciplinary home rehabilitation for patients with hip fracture

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):464.e9-464.e15.

Lower 5-yr subsequent surgery rate with Mobi-C disc arthroplasty vs ACDF with allograft

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):734-45

Cervical disc arthroplasty vs. ACDF for reoperation rates at index + adjacent disc levels

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1307-16.

ISASS 2016: Artificial disc replacement reduces incidence of adjacent level degeneration

ISASS 2016: Disc arthroplasty offers lower secondary adjacent-level surgery rate vs ACDF