Administrative Datasets and Registries in Orthopaedic Research.
Unlock this Podcast
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this Videos
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Daniel Berry
MD
Associate Professor, University of Minnesota, Mayo Clinic
View MoreThe discussion explores how rapidly expanding administrative datasets and national registries are reshaping orthopaedic research, highlighting both their promise and pitfalls. The experts emphasize that while these large resources enable unprecedented scale, they also invite misinterpretation, particularly when associations are mistaken for causation or when biases inherent to big data go unrecognized. The group reflects on lessons from building a national infrastructure, noting surprises such as gaps in Medicare datasets and challenges in evaluating new technologies through administrative data. They describe emerging opportunities, including embedding clinical trials within registries to reduce cost and improve efficiency, though legal and logistical barriers remain substantial. The upcoming journal supplement synthesizes these insights, offering practical guidance on database strengths, limitations, analytic strategies, and the future role of AI and natural language processing. Ultimately, the conversation underscores a cultural shift: as data volume grows, so must methodological rigor, national collaboration, and support for investigators aiming to translate massive datasets into reliable, clinically meaningful evidence.
DISCLAIMER
This content found on this page is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. If you require medical treatment, always seek the advice of your physician or go to your nearest emergency department. The opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints expressed by the individuals on the content found on this page do not reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of OrthoEvidence.